homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.142.255
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

    
Are one-way link exchanges better ?
mike2010




msg:4216948
 10:35 pm on Oct 14, 2010 (gmt 0)

I haven't kept up with SEO optimization for awhile, but I remember years back that our sites would get semi-penalized if we had too many outbound links to our link exchange sites.

Just wondering if its better for our SEO now to only have sites linking to our sites ? (one-way only)

I thought about going to LinksManager route, but they seem pretty expensive. and once again, not sure if it'll be worth it since i'll have so many outbound links as well.

If I do decide to go the one-way link route, any opinions regarding Linkworth vs. Text-Link-Ads are appreciated. It seems like those 2 are the heavyweights, but I see Linkworth being advertised here.

thanks much
MB

 

mike2010




msg:4217161
 1:35 pm on Oct 15, 2010 (gmt 0)

any advice is appreciated.

wheel




msg:4217184
 2:42 pm on Oct 15, 2010 (gmt 0)

1) look at what sites ranking in your niche are doing. Are their links reciprocal, or one way?
2) what I would consider to be the high end SEO outfits seem to use one way links. Different ways to do that, some use directories and similiar type of 'guaranteed approval' links, others have crawlers that look for sites that will give out relevant links. Either way, likely to be more expensive.

cnvi




msg:4218327
 4:57 pm on Oct 18, 2010 (gmt 0)

There is no such thing as a one way link exchange. Either a link is exchanged or not.

What you might be missing is this simple fact:

If you open yourself up to allowing link exchange requests to come in to you either via the service you mentioned above or your own suggest link form, the other potential link partner now sees you are interested in linking with relevant like minded sites and he/she is more willing to link to you first (a one way link) - because the one initiating the link request almost always links first. You can then either use the service you mentioned above to verify a true linkback and also look at other useful metrics to help make your decision, or you can do that work manually. However you do it, you then choose to either leave the one way link as a one way, or you link back to it making it a link exchange.

There is alot of psychology involved with all of this. The important thing to take away are these four simple concepts:

- If you publish a suggest link form (using the service you mentioned above or manually), you let the world know you are open to linking and then your inbound link request activity jumps up. Yes some of it will be junk. Delete it and move on. You will get some good link requests especially if your own links are well categorized including categories that naturally attract the low hanging fruit from genres you would be open to link with.

- Potential link partners who suggest a link with you are more likely to go ahead and link to you because they are anticipating the link back. Sometimes they will link to you and forget about it hoping you will link to them in the future. This happens more often than not.

- You should always maintain full control over who you link back to (maintain high relvancy ALWAYS). If you get 30 link requests in a month and 8 of then go ahead and link to you and you only link back to 3 of them, then you got 5 one ways and 3 link exchanges in that month.

- Editorially earned links whether one way or via link exchange survive for a long time on the web. Paid links and other schemes don't last forever because the paid ones are set to auto expire making you have to pay more. Links obtained via blogs have the shortest life span.

A few final notes:

Many seo self proclaimed experts spout comments such as "link exchange is dead". Nothing could be further from the truth. It might be dead for them because they want you to spend thousands a month so they can optimize a few keywords for you every month. But the truth is that relevant link exchange is alive and well especially among niche industries such as the wedding industry. Editorally earned links (even from links pages) are crawled and counted by G (the proof is in your log reports) and are factored into rankings. G intentionally doesn't admit this or publish every links page on the planet in their index because by hiding some of what they don't want you do know, they help keep webmasters from abusing some of these methods.

G has never said "do not link exchange" and why would they? They want you to obtain links with editorial discretion. It helps them determine what is popular and what is not. They realize its normal for relevant sites to link to each other. They simply want you to avoid doing it excessively (avoid full duplex services offering hundreds of links every day). It's not normal for a typical ecommerce website to obtain a high number of links over a short period of time unless you have published a cure for cancer or if you are giving away free money.

The proof of what I am saying is in the index. Millions of websites with relevant links or resources pages rank in the top ten for their keywords.

mike2010




msg:4220923
 1:59 pm on Oct 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

Very good piece, cnvi.. I appreciate it.

I'm still kind of anti the 2 way reciprocal route though.. A couple years ago I did everything legitimately with LinksManager.. Had about a 1000 links reciprocating. Had the pages all SEO'd out and everything...but my site was NOWHERE to be found on G with my main keywords.

A month after I canceled LinksManager and removed all the links from my site... I catapulted all the way to #1 ! Kind of sneakily, I never sent out an email to my 1000 linking partners...telling them that their links wouldn't be reciprocated anymore. So for several months after that, I was still #1 for my main keywords...as I still had a good portion of the 1000 links still pointing towards.

Currently (about 2 years later) only about a 100 of them are still linking.. But I still have decent keyword position.

So , to sum it up...my experiences with the 2-way have been crappy. but 1-way has been very good.

CainIV




msg:4222488
 11:23 pm on Oct 26, 2010 (gmt 0)

Reciprocal links from high quality, related websites are valued just as much as any other link as long as the link profile is diverse - meaning different types of links from different types of websites.

The net effect of the link is directly proportional to the quality of the referring page, in combination with the diversity of the backlink profile you already have, in my opinion.

If you have hundreds - or more - of "obviously" reciprocal links, they might all be discounted.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved