| 9:19 am on Nov 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Quality is best. In the end I find a quality link just a bit more work in getting than a crappy one so why not just go for the option that'll yield way better results?
| 9:41 am on Nov 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I think mass linking is the only way to get higher rankings over onpage seo.
I think quality links help only at the beginning. After this, mass linking pays...
| 9:51 am on Nov 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I would always try and go for quality over quantity (just mass produced links). Too many links too quickly CAN lead to a penalty. Social media links may also start to become more important in SE algos.
| 9:58 am on Nov 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
sem4u, why makes you feel that social media will increase in value when it's so easily manipulated?
| 10:11 am on Nov 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Well, it can be, but if you become a *big* star then your links could have more influence? This is only a theory at present...
| 3:23 pm on Nov 16, 2009 (gmt 0)|
If you want mass linking try to put together a viral marketing campaign for your business or website. The number of quality links will out weigh these mass linking links.