homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 174.129.103.100
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

    
I thought seeking reciprocal links was dead?
Running automated link management script still ok?
classa




msg:3866632
 8:39 pm on Mar 9, 2009 (gmt 0)

I used to own a web design company at <snip> (not trying to link to it) and we did away with the reciprocal links 2 years ago. We spent more of our time trying to develop links through blogs and forums, etc.

Now, I am looking to build another web development company. From what I am reading here, is quality reciprocal linking back in style?

[edited by: martinibuster at 9:51 pm (utc) on Mar. 9, 2009]
[edit reason] Removed Specifics that could lead to a site... [/edit]

 

InternetDominus




msg:3866671
 9:16 pm on Mar 9, 2009 (gmt 0)

Quality reciprocal linking has always worked, it has not changed. And one definition of quality means avoiding spamming sites, and link farms. So, you should always try to get links from sites related to your industry.

Some say that reciprocal linking does not work, and others that G does not consider reciprocated links any more, but you have to remember that YM still count links.

cnvi




msg:3866683
 9:24 pm on Mar 9, 2009 (gmt 0)

It was never out of style.

It was abused by many and that might have made some say it was out of style but if you are referring to how it affects traffic and search rankings, its never been out of style or frowned upon unless you are doing it wrong.

SEO's who focused on high volume irrelevant link exchange have published their own woeful tales of failure. But if you do it properly, link exchange not only acts as a branding and traffic building function, you can get new websites to rank well solely from relevant link exchange.

The key points to keep in mind are:

- Maintain high relevancy. Ask yourself, does this site I am about to link to benefit my end user? If it does, get the link. If it does not or you aren't sure, pass on it.

- Obtain links in slow/natural volume. That means do not join a fully automated service that will force you to link in high volume overnight. Slow natural volume means you get three links today, one tomorrow, none the next few days, one the next day, six the next day, none for the next week, and so on. Search engines are watching the rate at which you obtain links. Obtain them slowly and naturally.

- Avoid full duplex systems and services. Services that claim "500 links overnight for only $50!" most likely force you to link with those 500 sites. Or they are one ways from junk sites. Avoid full duplex because who you link to tells the search engines exactly what kind of strategy you are signed up for.

- Maintain editorial discretion, always. You should control who you are linking to, not someone else or a software or service. If you do outsource linking decisions to another company or person inside your company, make sure they know what types of sites you do and do not want to be linked with.

- Use editor based software. If you do use software to manage linking, make sure it's EDITOR BASED. You should maintain full control over who you are linking with.

- Organize your links neatly. No more than 100 per page. It's ok to organize your links in a traditional directory format. Search engines don't mind classic menu driven directories just as long as you are maintaining high relevancy and natural link rates.

nealrodriguez




msg:3867366
 6:21 pm on Mar 10, 2009 (gmt 0)

Slow natural volume means you get three links today, one tomorrow, none the next few days, one the next day, six the next day, none for the next week, and so on.

with all due respect, i think you could build links a bit faster than that; i have seen sites make the popular section of social media sites like digg and have hundreds of sites point links to them in a day or two; they rank for keywords prominently and receive residual traffic from the blogs and other webmasters. with that type of exposure you're probably getting less than 25% of your traffic from the traffic, so most wouldn't care about a penalty. but these sites will rank page one for broad based keywords in the titles and high up in the body.

then again you are referring to reciprocals, so it may be a different issue; but a blogger friend of mine was also ranking for several competitive keywords after going on a reciprocal binge of a few hundred sites in a few days; no penalties, he's still growing.

cnvi




msg:3867375
 6:31 pm on Mar 10, 2009 (gmt 0)

i think you could build links a bit faster than that

Agreed.. it was simply an example because people say things like "slow natural volume" but its never explained exactly what that is.

My point was simply to obtain links at a speed and volume that is not artificially inflated.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved