| 2:35 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
The answer to your question depends on what kind of links you are buying and if they are related to your site.
If you are buying legitimate placements on sites highly relevant to your own that benefit your end user, the quality of the link and the site it's on will naturally throttle the volume to be under 100 a month.
If the links are coming from sites that are borderline with regards to relevancy and volume, the bar drops and you should be very careful.
Think quality, not quantity.
I would rather have 5 quality links from highly relevant sites that are sending me real traffic rather than a much higher number from sites with much less relevancy and usefulness for my end user.
| 5:42 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
If you don't care about the quality, go ahead and use free press release distribution networks but I have to agree with cnvi on the quality which is why I encourage diversity.
| 6:55 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Well, the main reason I'm buying links is to improve my serps. Getting traffic is secondary.
| 7:03 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
The actual number will certainly depend on "normal" backlink discovery for that site, say if you are google.com then they this normal number will be measured in millions where as for a small site it would be a lot lower. You should certainly think more of quality than quantity - thats the key.
| 7:07 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Google seems to look for patterns in aquiring links. How many links have you been getting in the past? Keep a constant pace and you should be okay. Buy 1000 links at once and your most likely a target for disaster.
| 7:12 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Buying links to improve serps is dangerous business. Try to make link buying decisions based on what will improve traffic. The serps will improve as a secondary result naturally. Trying to switch up the two can lead to a mess that is difficult to repair.
Search engines like google can spot artificial link building a mile away. Don't give the search engines a reason to penalize your site.
| 7:14 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
one more suggestion.. the money you are using to buy traffic can be spent on quality copywriting. Quality copy naturally attracts links. Webmasters will be more willing to link to your site if you have unique copy to offer.
| 9:11 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
|Buy 1000 links at once and your most likely a target for disaster. |
|Google seems to look for patterns in aquiring links. |
|Search engines like google can spot artificial link building a mile away. |
It's debatable whether the above is true or not. There are some who will deny the above quotes based on their personal experience.
Can it be that it depends on how you do it? Could it be there are more variables than the ones listed above? I know a guy who is selling links from a huge inventory, dropping links from within content. Will his clients be caught?
I know another guy who is selling dot edu links from established and authoritative high PageRank pages. Will his clients be caught?
What about sites that acquire thousands of links through becoming newsworthy or diggworthy?
| 9:24 pm on Jul 16, 2008 (gmt 0)|
|It's arguable whether the above is going on or not. |
I think a little of both is always going on. Google catches some but not all cases like this. In rechecking a fairly spam prone set of serps recently, most of the sites with massive acquired links from a few months ago had been kicked out, but different ones, also with acquired links, had taken their place.
| 11:36 pm on Jul 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Go slow, is much better.
Also, think about how quick you competitors got links. Was it slow or quick? Do the same or next to.
Anyway, quality rules. Think about it.
| 3:43 am on Jul 24, 2008 (gmt 0)|
i hear what this thread is saying. slow and steady is the best. that goes without saying, but....
what if i have an old established 'website' with a good alexa and an authority 'blog' decides to pick me up? this blog has 40,000 indexed pages and is three times the authority of me. if he decides to place my website link on his blog sitewide and chooses some relevant but random link text, will Google treat that link with any suspicion considering the number of pages it's being added too? to me that isn't slow link building but then again, it's only one site. how would they know whether i bought the link or not? the blog content and site content are in the same vertical, both site and blog are big authorities....
| 8:36 am on Jul 24, 2008 (gmt 0)|
mrrob, i think having 40,000 SIDEWIDE links from just one site is not much threatening than having 40,000 links in an instant from a variety of websites.