idev
msg:3874687 | 10:39 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0) |
nope. just ignore it.
|
CLTaylor
msg:3874732 | 11:23 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0) |
OK, I can ignore it, but I'm wondering if she's being sold a bill of goods from her current developer. Does it hurt her page in the SERPs to have hundreds of these keyphrases in her metatags?
|
idev
msg:3874739 | 11:30 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0) |
Google will ignore the tags it doesn't knows. And the keyphrase is way too uncommon for SEs to use for ranking. So that's neutral. I'd just remove that for the markup/content ratio in case nothing internal/external uses that. E.g. that might be a helper for a script or something like that.
|
nealrodriguez
msg:3875238 | 3:42 pm on Mar 20, 2009 (gmt 0) |
even if it's a mistyped 'keyword' tag, it barely holds any weight any more in the se's according to matt cutts: matt cutts on usatoday [usatoday.com] it's ranked a solid .05 in brett tabke's scale of importance: [webmasterworld.com...]
|
|
