daveVk
msg:4494570 | 3:27 am on Sep 13, 2012 (gmt 0) |
I assume the .clone() in datejs is not a method of a jQuery defined object, so there be no conflict ?
|
nelsonm
msg:4494780 | 4:00 pm on Sep 13, 2012 (gmt 0) |
I just don't see how there would not be a conflict. How would the browser's interpreter know which library to use (datejs or jquery) when it incounters ".clone()"?
|
daveVk
msg:4494942 | 11:56 pm on Sep 13, 2012 (gmt 0) |
datejs usage of clone() is like
var myDate = new Date();
var cloneDate = myDate.clone();
It has added a method called 'clone' to objects created with the Date Constructor.
So objects NOT created with the Date Constructor will not be effected, and are free to have a clone property of there own.
".clone()" only has meaning in the context of what object it follows.
|
nelsonm
msg:4494949 | 12:26 am on Sep 14, 2012 (gmt 0) |
interesting, i guess i don't understand how the interpreter figures it out so i'll take your word for it.
However, i'll try asap.
thanks.
|
|
