Msg#: 4272780 posted 3:43 am on Feb 26, 2011 (gmt 0)
Never have done rollover images, everything i find shows it using a "name" attribute, even some javascipt i found, and that the only thing I can not get to validate and its driving me crazy. Can someone please help, or point me towards a better way to do the rollover?
using: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
only issue is with each rollover link, the "name" wont validate and only shows 1 error, but Say i remove the first attribute "name", it will than show the second one as an error. and removing "name" renders it useless because it wont roll over
Msg#: 4272780 posted 10:26 pm on Feb 27, 2011 (gmt 0)
Msg#: 4272780 posted 2:24 am on Feb 28, 2011 (gmt 0)
Encyclo, I used to believe that such old browsers were gone, too. A coworker at the University of Michigan was teaching a computer class and found that nearly 1/3 of her class couldn't even see her pages. She was using the newest stuff and they were using WebTV!
Msg#: 4272780 posted 2:32 am on Feb 28, 2011 (gmt 0)
Anyone using WebTV these days will find that vast swathes of the web are unusable. There are always a few edge cases, but I've not seen WebTV or any old browsers in any stats for many years. You have to draw the line somewhere, and for me WebTV is way over the other side of that line. :)
Msg#: 4272780 posted 2:45 am on Feb 28, 2011 (gmt 0)
Could she draw the line at losing 1/3 of paying students? It was a language class not web-related except in the sense that it was on-line. To keep her job teaching the class, she had to make her pages available to all her students. The "line" she had to draw was whether or not she wished to get paid.