homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.242.126.9
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / HTML
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL

HTML Forum

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 31 ( 1 [2]     
HTML 5 draft - alt attributes not required!
tedster

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3435869 posted 7:59 pm on Aug 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

The currently published specs for HTML 5 at whatwg.org [whatwg.org] no longer require the alt attribute for an img element -- and the longdesc attribute is nowhere to be seen in the current draft.

Accessibility folks are debating these changes, but I agree with Lachlan Hunt:

Making alt technically optional doesn’t stand in the way of accessibility requirements, nor greatly impact upon accessibility evangelism. It just acknowledges the reality of the situation in the hope of reducing the prevalence of poor quality, automatically generated alt text.

[blog.whatwg.org...]

Thanks to best practices advocate Juicy Studio [juicystudio.com] for publicizing these issues.

 

sydney web designer

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3435869 posted 2:15 pm on Sep 21, 2007 (gmt 0)

Back to the original points in Tedster's quote -

"It just acknowledges the reality of the situation in the hope of reducing the prevalence of poor quality, automatically generated alt text."

I was under the impression that one of the driving forces behind this move was sites that flickr that tend toward having large numbers of blank or automated alt tags where there are millions of web2.0 users who don't understand the importance of a good text description.

I think the better solution if this is the case is to maintain the alt tag and simply encourage site owners to make image descriptions or (at minimum)tags necessary for uploading images through social network web interfaces. This would have the added benefit of having visual data that is directly referenced and described by the person who is uploading it.

Here is a Zen question for site owners -
"If you don't want to tell me what it is, why are you putting it on my site?"

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 31 ( 1 [2]
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / HTML
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved