pavlovapete
msg:4131091 | 10:00 pm on May 11, 2010 (gmt 0) |
This is a great improvement!
Hopefully it won't be too long before we can use it in Australia.
|
Atun
msg:4131153 | 2:29 am on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Thank you Rehan,
Hope also to see it worldwide soon.
I would like some credit though. It is exactly like the "positive keyword" option that I floated here a while back ;)
The idea of being able to use broad match but insist that a term or terms be included will be helpful.
+widgets near +chicago then should give me "a chicago widget place", "widgets somewhere in the vicinity of chicago", etc.
Without having to include either:
Several dozen specific phrase matches to catch those
Also not having to add a few dozen -negative keywords to exlcude all the extraneous stuff that plain broad match widgets near chicago can brings up. I had gotten used to seeing queries as exotic as "zebras near chicago" and my widget ain't a zebra by a longshot!
Atun
|
GroovyDave
msg:4131169 | 3:28 am on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0) |
This looks really useful. Anxiously awaiting this in the US.
|
RhinoFish
msg:4131352 | 1:33 pm on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0) |
LOVE THIS!
|
after_hours
msg:4131454 | 4:06 pm on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Awesome!
|
Gmorgan
msg:4131847 | 6:24 am on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Well done Google!
We were starting to get fed up of spending hours a day adding in (some very random) negative keywords for client accounts.
|
netmeg
msg:4132071 | 4:07 pm on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0) |
I'm setting up some accounts with plus marks already, just in anticipation. Want to be ready on the first day when they open it up.
|
GroovyDave
msg:4170086 | 4:36 pm on Jul 14, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Netmeg, looks like you're good to go:
[adwordsagency.blogspot.com...]
|
netmeg
msg:4170581 | 10:59 am on Jul 15, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Yep. Been having me some fun; can't wait to see some results.
|
RhinoFish
msg:4170688 | 1:32 pm on Jul 15, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Happy happy day, it's here!
To me, this is a more important change than the entire interface overhaul, keyword matching is at the core of almost every real challenge in paid advertising.
This new toy is like Xmas in July!
|
briggidere
msg:4171261 | 4:37 am on Jul 16, 2010 (gmt 0) |
How do you think this would work?
"+wiget +example"
Would you get a modified broad phrase match?
|
RhinoFish
msg:4171636 | 4:21 pm on Jul 16, 2010 (gmt 0) |
you mean by misspelling widget as wiget? just a guess, but i'd say G would have a difficult time understanding what this word means, so there'd be few synonyms, and it wouldn't ever do much triggering.
but if you spelled widget correctly, i bet it'd sweep up anyone who typed it incorrectly.
|
RhinoFish
msg:4171637 | 4:22 pm on Jul 16, 2010 (gmt 0) |
anyone played with the dki and mod-broad yet?
|
Channel01
msg:4172022 | 8:05 am on Jul 17, 2010 (gmt 0) |
you mean by misspelling widget as wiget? just a guess, but i'd say G would have a difficult time understanding what this word means, so there'd be few synonyms, and it wouldn't ever do much triggering.
but if you spelled widget correctly, i bet it'd sweep up anyone who typed it incorrectly. |
|
I think she's asking how Google would handle that keyword since it would be a combo of phrase and modified broad match. It's an interesting question. My guess is that you would receive an error if you tried to submit that keyword.
|
LucidSW
msg:4172063 | 1:40 pm on Jul 17, 2010 (gmt 0) |
"+wiget +example"
Don't think you'd get an error but that's not how it's supposed to be used, at least not in the way that briggidere is thinking of using it.
|
RhinoFish
msg:4172123 | 6:24 pm on Jul 17, 2010 (gmt 0) |
oh, she meant WITH the outer quotes.
i don't know, but i can see when you use +one +two the match type column calls it broad. so i'd guess it won't work as a modified broad.
|
|
