homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.191.80
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdWords
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: buckworks & eWhisper & skibum

Google AdWords Forum

    
New feature: Modified Broad Match
Not quite standard broad match, but close
Rehan




msg:4130984
 6:31 pm on May 11, 2010 (gmt 0)

For quite a while, many of us have wished for the return of standard (non-expanded) broad match in AdWords, and Google has finally introduced something close to it -- Modified Broad Match.

Read more on the official AdWords blog at [adwords.blogspot.com...]

If you prefix a keyword with the + modifier, the keyword must appear in the user query "exactly or as a close variant". That means +shoes could appear for "shoe" but not for "boots".

I'm sure I'm not the only one that has been very cautious with broad match because of the lack of control in how it's expanded to match other queries. Modified broad match makes a big difference for this issue. The blog post says:

During initial tests, advertisers who mainly used phrase and exact match found that adding modified broad match keywords increased campaign clicks and conversions, while providing more precise control than with broad match.


For now it's available only for advertisers in Canada and the UK, though.

 

pavlovapete




msg:4131091
 10:00 pm on May 11, 2010 (gmt 0)

This is a great improvement!

Hopefully it won't be too long before we can use it in Australia.

Atun




msg:4131153
 2:29 am on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

Thank you Rehan,

Hope also to see it worldwide soon.

I would like some credit though. It is exactly like the "positive keyword" option that I floated here a while back ;)

The idea of being able to use broad match but insist that a term or terms be included will be helpful.

+widgets near +chicago then should give me "a chicago widget place", "widgets somewhere in the vicinity of chicago", etc.

Without having to include either:

Several dozen specific phrase matches to catch those

Also not having to add a few dozen -negative keywords to exlcude all the extraneous stuff that plain broad match widgets near chicago can brings up. I had gotten used to seeing queries as exotic as "zebras near chicago" and my widget ain't a zebra by a longshot!

Atun

GroovyDave




msg:4131169
 3:28 am on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

This looks really useful. Anxiously awaiting this in the US.

RhinoFish




msg:4131352
 1:33 pm on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

LOVE THIS!

after_hours




msg:4131454
 4:06 pm on May 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

Awesome!

Gmorgan




msg:4131847
 6:24 am on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

Well done Google!

We were starting to get fed up of spending hours a day adding in (some very random) negative keywords for client accounts.

netmeg




msg:4132071
 4:07 pm on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

I'm setting up some accounts with plus marks already, just in anticipation. Want to be ready on the first day when they open it up.

GroovyDave




msg:4170086
 4:36 pm on Jul 14, 2010 (gmt 0)

Netmeg, looks like you're good to go:

[adwordsagency.blogspot.com...]

netmeg




msg:4170581
 10:59 am on Jul 15, 2010 (gmt 0)

Yep. Been having me some fun; can't wait to see some results.

RhinoFish




msg:4170688
 1:32 pm on Jul 15, 2010 (gmt 0)

Happy happy day, it's here!

To me, this is a more important change than the entire interface overhaul, keyword matching is at the core of almost every real challenge in paid advertising.

This new toy is like Xmas in July!

briggidere




msg:4171261
 4:37 am on Jul 16, 2010 (gmt 0)

How do you think this would work?

"+wiget +example"

Would you get a modified broad phrase match?

RhinoFish




msg:4171636
 4:21 pm on Jul 16, 2010 (gmt 0)

you mean by misspelling widget as wiget? just a guess, but i'd say G would have a difficult time understanding what this word means, so there'd be few synonyms, and it wouldn't ever do much triggering.

but if you spelled widget correctly, i bet it'd sweep up anyone who typed it incorrectly.

RhinoFish




msg:4171637
 4:22 pm on Jul 16, 2010 (gmt 0)

anyone played with the dki and mod-broad yet?

Channel01




msg:4172022
 8:05 am on Jul 17, 2010 (gmt 0)


you mean by misspelling widget as wiget? just a guess, but i'd say G would have a difficult time understanding what this word means, so there'd be few synonyms, and it wouldn't ever do much triggering.

but if you spelled widget correctly, i bet it'd sweep up anyone who typed it incorrectly.


I think she's asking how Google would handle that keyword since it would be a combo of phrase and modified broad match. It's an interesting question. My guess is that you would receive an error if you tried to submit that keyword.

LucidSW




msg:4172063
 1:40 pm on Jul 17, 2010 (gmt 0)

"+wiget +example"

Don't think you'd get an error but that's not how it's supposed to be used, at least not in the way that briggidere is thinking of using it.

RhinoFish




msg:4172123
 6:24 pm on Jul 17, 2010 (gmt 0)

oh, she meant WITH the outer quotes.

i don't know, but i can see when you use +one +two the match type column calls it broad. so i'd guess it won't work as a modified broad.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdWords
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved