I have changed my keyword bids using conversion optimizer tool but iam not satisfied with that tool ,so i would like to know how to insert previous bids for the keywords as they were before.
I've looked through the docs, and was hoping to get some insight from someone who's tested this.
Since they have visibility into the overall keyword bidding environment, Google could take advantage of expected bid vs. actual cpc relationships for different positions in ways that no external optimization system could, but such a system would not serve to maximize their own revenue.
Does Google provide transparency into the actual bids they are pushing up?
Brava_seo, why did you decide to turn it off so quickly?
Great I just bought Bidbuddy bidmanagement Software. There goes my advantage and investment.
BidBuddy was never an advantageous system. It was built for the old Yahoo system, wherein the bid landscape was transparent. It was never capable of doing the data modeling necessary to actually see and optimize within AdWords.
shorbreak: That's very interesting. Bidbuddy now claims it can peform both CPA and ROI strategy's within Google. Do you have experience with Bidbuddy already or wher did you hear this?
Thanks for your input on this!
Up until a month ago I worked at Efficient Frontier for 4 years, including spending most of the past year opening offices in London and Paris; I've since left to start my own company.
Here's something I wrote on my blog back in November 2006:
"I'm over in London today meeting with our UK team as well as some clients that we've recently signed and who were previously using an SEM firm who in turn used idBay uddyBay (and you thought I only spoke two languages). For all the bravado and swagger with which said SEM firm/bid tool carries themselves across the UK and European search market, what I learned was shocking if not for the fact that I've seen it a hundred times.
So we went into the client's AdWords campaign and look at what reports had been run in the past, and it quickly became clear that the advertiser's "buddy" had never actually run either an impression or average position report.
This, folks, is proof positive that said SEM was neither looking at or making use of the data needed to model cost, revenue and volume trade offs for the advertiser's search campaign.
This *should* be shocking, but the reality is it's what we see 50-75% of the time in the States and 90%+ in Europe. SEM's here have had such an easy living the last few years that they've never actually had to build or do anything of value. Agency rebates from the SE's have, in and of themselves, made agencies look good.
As I told an unfortunately sparse crowd at SES Paris yesterday, European advertisers' revenue growth and margins from search *will* start to plateau in the coming months and quarters, and that will force advertisers to cast a more critical eye on their SEM providers and keyword management technologies.
Put another way, if your investment manager didn't look at the trading volume, 50/200-day moving averages or historical earnings reports of the stocks he bought for you, you'd either fire him or go broke."
Do a search on Google for
searchquant "history of bid management" and click on the first result, which will take you to a video wherein I talk about the history of rules-based bid management tools (of which BidBuddy is one).
i don't run reports that often as well. (once a month) but my campaigns are managed well. You don't need to run a report to manage your campaign. Or do i misunderstand something? And no offence what has this to do with bidbuddy?
Let's please come back on topic as I would love to hear some feedback about whether this feature is useful or not. I have several smaller campaigns that I would love to set a target acq cost on and forget about....
OK, back on topic, I've talked to two people today who are testing Conversion Optimizer, and both have said that results are general 10-15% worse than their own previous efforts. Given that we're only 1-2 days in I'd say that's a very, very good sign that the tool will end up being effective for some advertisers; as the system gets more data it will likely perform better & better.
Just my $0.02
When I first heard about Google's PPA program (Google as "Super Affiliate") I thought, "Wow. They really want to get their hands on our ideal CPA." and stayed as far away as possible. Seeing Conversion Optimizer listed in our account this afternoon gave me the same shudder. Why?
Google already knows enough about our business and as soon as they have a definitive idea as to what we're willing to pay per conversion they instantly have a bead on our potential profitability--and what they can and can't charge charge us.
I personally feel this type of info should be kept from all of the SE's at all costs--we keep all revenue figures out of Adwords, Analytics, etc for this specific reason. I mean, I know it's probably all a lost cause at this point but I'd rather not hand them our most proprietary info on a platter if I can help it.
We pay enough per click already :(
Very interesting to see this feature released. Last week at a YSM workshop, they announced the same feature for their platform. This ability to optimize accounts with complete conversion data is a great method of bid management IMO. I have been a client of Efficient Frontier for over a year and their methods go further that the two current offerings by Google and Yahoo.
Taking a quick look at the Google service I saw the following-
-requires 300+ conversions in the last 30 days. This may be a high hurdle for advertisers to cross.
-advanced features like preferred bidding, adv bid scheduling and use of adwords editor are not supported. This is likely just because of the product's infancy but these tools are necessities for advertisers looking to do this on their own without the help of another third party.
-I am assuming the conversion values being passed back into the conversion optimizer are not very detailed, or at least advertisers cannot make use of passing detailed data. Say you want to optmize CPA or ROAS from a conversion profit aspect, I don't know if that can be easily accomplished.
I would like to disable conversion optimizer because As i inserted bid for xyz keyword is 1pound where the average position of the xyz keyword is 4.5, after i used conversion optimizer the tool replaced bid from 1 to 5 pounds and still the average position is 4.1 which doesn't make big difference in CTR or Conversions ratio. so by this tool google is going be more beneficial and rich - NOT WE.
I have changed all the bids replaced by conversion optimizer tool.
|I mean, I know it's probably all a lost cause at this point but I'd rather not hand them our most proprietary info on a platter if I can help it. |
Then don't do it. Never ever do it. At least not with real numbers.
You can send any value you want to any tracking script including the Google one. Try sending a value that is a conversion value * .5 and see if it cuts your CPC down. If it does go down then send conversion value * .25 and see what happens. You'll of course still know the real numbers.
Verrrrrry interesting concept!
Thanks for spotting this new feature, running scared, and for starting a thread about it. (And for mentioning the Inside AdWords blog as well.)
As I normally do when WebmasterWorld is discussing a new AdWords feature or tool, I will forward your feedback (regardless of whether it is positive or otherwise) to the right folks - so please know that your comments will be heard. In point of fact, I sent them the link yesterday. ;)
A quick note to bava_seo, who wrote:
|I have changed my keyword bids using conversion optimizer tool but iam not satisfied with that tool ,so i would like to know how to insert previous bids for the keywords as they were before. |
|I would like to disable conversion optimizer because [...] I have changed all the bids replaced by conversion optimizer tool. |
Please note that when one disables Conversion Optimizer and goes back to MaxCPC the system will have 'remembered' the previous settings, and will automatically revert to the old CPC bids.
In case you're not familiar with how or where to disable Conversion Optimizer, here's some info from the AdWords Help Center:
How do I start (or stop) using the Conversion Optimizer?
Excerpting from that page:
|To disable the Conversion Optimizer, follow these steps: |
1. Sign in to your AdWords account at https://adwords.google.com.
2. Select the checkbox next to the appropriate campaign or campaigns.
3. Click Edit Settings.
4. Under the Advanced Options section, click View and edit bidding options.
5. On the Bidding Options page, select your new option.
6. Click Continue.
7. On the confirmation page that follows, you can choose your settings, then click Save Changes.
I'm going to play with this for a day and see what results I get. I hope I don't regret it ><
Actually - while I'm here, sorry to take this slightly off topic ... there used to be a ROI report in the old Google Analytics - I've tried to query with Adwords/Analytics support (in Ireland for me), but I've had no luck.
Is there an equivalent ROI reporting tool in the current system? I don't just want Conversion costs and rates, I'd be after cost => actual conversion value to me (if that makes sense).
So adwordsadvisor this his how a proper bid manager should work. (grab your pencil and paper)
cpa target = 100 actual cpa = 200 bid on keyword should be reduced with 50%
what numbers should be taking into this calculation?
At least 200 clicks before google makes any(!) adjustment to the bidprice.
In june my cottages convert different then in oktober.
clicks in the near past count more then clicks in the far past.
don't put as much BS in this tool as other companies did.
my bank account
If you need more advice, fly me in!
It was a proven failure with conversion optimizer for me, if any body has proved success with the same tool then let me know what happened there in your account.
justageek: That is an interesting concept. So far we've gone with leaving all those $ variables blank--but that could very well be a fascinating experiment :)
After day one of going with CPA:
Total overall sales down about 20% (but this is day-by-day rather than weekly) - this could be seen as a 'normal'. Prices for the items I sell are subject to relatively high competition and will fluctuate.
All the following are comparisons with a daily average.
Total Adwords expenditure for the newly altered campaign - 30% higher
Total conversion percentage - more or less the same
Total conversion cost - approx 15% more expensive
Total number of conversions - more or less the same (so far)
Not convinced yet - but I'll hold out and see what happens over the weekend. Maybe :p
|Not convinced yet - but I'll hold out and see what happens over the weekend. Maybe :p |
Try lowering the reported conversion amount. Maybe (amount * 0.75) and see if the costs come back down.
I'd love to try it but I don't use the feature myself. But I, and a couple others here, are curious to know if it'll lower the costs :-)
Comments for a few of you specifically:
If your total sales are down 20% while total spend is up 30%, how can your cost of conversions have only increased 15%, or did I miss something? I'm the biggest knuckle-head on this forum, so it's possible.
2. JAG - if you passed a conversion value of <[Real value], will Google send you to detention?
3. Bava_seo, you said "google is going be more beneficial and rich - NOT WE." - That may well about sum it up.
From the WE camp,
As few guys you said i again runned a conversion optimizer to my campaign to check out this for a week how this tool is going to work - lets see.
Sorry for not being clear enough when writing:
I'm currently testing keyword: 'apples' (with CFA)
Adwords also has campaigns for other fruit. Overall sales for fruit were down about 20%.
All the other vague numbers were about apples :)
|2. JAG - if you passed a conversion value of <[Real value], will Google send you to detention? |
Ha! Only if they can see the real numbers in your accounting program.
before i start, i must admit i'm a Vendor. i hope you'll be willing to read through and cooperate :-)
i'm working in a company that built a robust solution to optimize NET PROFIT on e-commerce/lead gen/affiliate AdWords campaigns. we are averaging an increase in profits of 30% within 4 weeks.
our main two advantages, as we see it, are (before this optimizer came out...):
1. fully automated decision making system, that chose and perform bids for you and take each keyword to the optimal position (optimal in terms of NET PROFIT).
2. not like most of the optimizing SEMs out there, we do so for every campaign size (although the statistical effect is starting somewhere in the 100 conversions a month per account range) . We take no min. monthly fee or a set up fee. Simply 3% of spend, after our first month free trial.
my questions for you are as follows:
1. do you think pitching for NET PROFIT optimization instead of CPA optimization is appealing? Is the difference clear? Is it understood that having a fixed CPA will not bring you to your max margin overall, since at CPA thinking, you don't consider sales VOLUME, only cost per click VS. conversion rate?
2. Google approach- are they trying to replace SEM companies (service and/or enablers) by giving full solution to their advertisers? or is it just a nice feature they put there and will not improve it further?
3. is there a place for the channel to tell the advertiser how much to pay them? isn't it a conflict if they bid for two direct competitors on the same time?
Thanks for sharing a though, i'm wondering how this will affect us...puzzled
[edited by: Booster at 8:42 pm (utc) on Oct. 4, 2007]
|1. do you think pitching for NET PROFIT optimization instead of CPA optimization is appealing? Is the difference clear? Is it understood that having a fixed CPA will not bring you to your max margin overall, since at CPA thinking, you don't consider sales VOLUME, only cost per click VS. conversion rate? |
Not really all that appealing but I'm not a sales person. I'm sure it is a good part of the pitch.
|2. Google approach- are they trying to replace SEM companies (service and/or enablers) by giving full solution to their advertisers? or is it just a nice feature they put there and will not improve it further? |
I have no doubt Google would like to do it but I don't see how they can when it is in their best interest to NOT optimize to a minimum spend. The best campaign for them is one where the advertiser makes just enough money to justify keeping the campaign running. Advertisers want a lot more than that.
|3. is there a place for the channel to tell the advertiser how much to pay them? isn't it a conflict if they bid for two direct competitors on the same time? |
Good question...don't know.