homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.66.204
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & jatar k & martinibuster

Google AdSense Forum

    
What's your worst AdSense Ad Unit Size?
nickys




msg:4622328
 12:05 pm on Nov 10, 2013 (gmt 0)

My worse ad is a 160 by 600 on the right side of all of the pages.
It's my biggest ad and I would have thought it would perform great. But it performs terrible.
Any solutions?

 

frankleeceo




msg:4622351
 4:00 pm on Nov 10, 2013 (gmt 0)

not really any solution, it's worst because advertisers bid less for that size ads in general.

you could however get that ad unit additional eyeball time if you place navigational menus adjacent to that unit. But that eats into your useable content areas.

but if you have that much space to either side of your page, a 300x250 usually performs better. I assume you use those units as pure display and not going for targeted text in-content.

I would personally combine the use of 300 x 250 + leaderboard banner + 160 x 600 to get the most of bids for each individual sizes, placed on your most visible locations to garner the most attention and potential clicks.

frankleeceo




msg:4622359
 4:06 pm on Nov 10, 2013 (gmt 0)

Btw, my own personal setup now consists of CPM/CPA ads served by other ad agencies (vertical specific) above the fold.

I then place my adsense ads further below the page to where I know my visitors would go. Such as either in content, below content or next to navigational positions.

I am happy with my setup and they are probably going to last until the end of this holiday season.

I see less raw adsense earnings, but the combined total trumps pure adsense alone, and the combination strategy trumps going pure third party agency as well.

breeks




msg:4622636
 10:29 pm on Nov 11, 2013 (gmt 0)

160x600 used to be my best paying ad unit up until the redesign, now its my worst. 300x250, 336x280 and leaderboard work the best.

fumanchu




msg:4622970
 3:00 pm on Nov 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

I use a 300x250 in the sidebar, and one 728x90 above the content, and one below the content. Works very well for me. I do not care for the 160x600 size at all.

nickys




msg:4623069
 7:54 pm on Nov 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

@fumanchu How does the ctr compare in the three ad sizes?

fumanchu




msg:4623084
 10:19 pm on Nov 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

728x90 gets higher ctr. By far. But the 300x250 does still do well in its own way. 160x600 never did all that great for me, and it takes up too much space in the sidebar.

nickys




msg:4623109
 12:11 am on Nov 14, 2013 (gmt 0)

Which 720x90 does better the one on top or the one on bottom?

fumanchu




msg:4623166
 6:14 am on Nov 14, 2013 (gmt 0)

Depends on the day, oddly enough. I've seen days where the bottom one kicks ass and then vice versa. So I leave them both there and it works out fine. There's no way to predict which will do better on a consistent basis.

Just put one before the content at the top of the article column, and one after it right after the content ends. If you need to then make your article column wide enough to fit the 728x90 right over the title of the article. Don't put it way at the top of your blog, it should appear right in the article column itself.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved