homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.163.72.86
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & jatar k & martinibuster

Google AdSense Forum

    
adsense text only better than all media types?
how do you doing?
Kickedout




msg:4155137
 2:56 am on Jun 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

Time ago I used only text ads. Switched to all type of media in order to take advantage or more possible income. But didn't improve at all.

Do you notice allowing all media type is good for you? Or otherwise?

 

JasonDX




msg:4155143
 3:35 am on Jun 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

Google states that it will help your earnings but when I tried running image ads in the past my earnings would drop due to lower ctr. Nowadays activating image ads has no affect on earnings.

OutdoorWebcams




msg:4155176
 7:57 am on Jun 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

For the first time *ever* I enabled image ads on some ad slots three weeks ago: CTR 10% up, eCPM 15% up.

Maybe people are actually clicking image ads, or the remaining text ads are showing 'better' (more interesting?) ads.

wyweb




msg:4155225
 11:56 am on Jun 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

Do you notice allowing all media type is good for you? Or otherwise?

Or otherwise.

drall




msg:4155229
 12:13 pm on Jun 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

CTR has been dropping every year since 07 for us across hundreds of different topics. We now range at just 25% of our first few years with adsense. Judging from how are comp has placed ads they are seeing the same thing. All used to run 1 well placed text only block, they are now running 3 regular blocks with a few adlinks and search. All with image ads enabled.

People just are not clicking as much because
- the great recession
- duel wars with a possible 3rd in the works with Iran
- housing collapse
- wall street collapse
- banking collapse
- euro meltdown
- possible double dip recession or worse depression
- massive unemployement
- massive underemployment
- record US debt
- US GDP and Debt almost tied
- Fear is rampant
- middle-upperclass totally freaked out(2 neighbors had bomb shelters installed recently)
- wall street totally out of tune with reality (re Charles Munger, Warren Buffets longtime business partners article "Basically, It's Over"
- completely unrelated "interest based ads"
- I am pretty sure adsense blindness is setting in

I could go on and on;)

We also enabled image ads across many sites and saw a small increase in both ctr and earnings as in the past it didnt help but hurt. Seems it is taking quite a bit to get a user to click nowadays.

wyweb




msg:4155232
 12:31 pm on Jun 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

Nice summary drall.

I'm going with ad blindness.

I'm going with economy too. Advertisers getting picky with their money.

You left out phases of the moon.

netmeg




msg:4155236
 1:10 pm on Jun 19, 2010 (gmt 0)

I am directly testing image ads against text ads at the moment; was really expecting low performance from image but I have been surprised. The CTR is better, and the eCPM only a little less. This didn't used to be the case.

Kickedout




msg:4156847
 3:00 pm on Jun 22, 2010 (gmt 0)

I do have them activated but my earnings still dropping.

dataguy




msg:4157063
 7:14 pm on Jun 22, 2010 (gmt 0)

An AdSense rep told me the most beneficial way that enabling text-only or image-only works is because it forces fewer ad options, which can raise the bidding price.

The only way I got it to work for me is to display one ad image-only, and the other ad which displays both will increase CPM, I suppose because of a lower availability of ad slots.

zdgn




msg:4157089
 7:46 pm on Jun 22, 2010 (gmt 0)

Image ads have been super on some of my sites. So much so that now I've actually dedicated a few first-serve slots to image-only. Both CTR and CPM are very juicy on those.

netmeg




msg:4157132
 8:32 pm on Jun 22, 2010 (gmt 0)

Because I'm testing, I am rotating text-only ad code with image-only ad code. Very happy with the results.

Sgt_Kickaxe




msg:4157161
 9:25 pm on Jun 22, 2010 (gmt 0)

image ads are hit and miss, the creative being displayed has a huge impact on CTR.

The goal of image advertisers is to get their banner in front of you but not get any clicks. Why? because they want branding for free. Imagine showing your banner on thousands of pages per day, almost free!

Text on the other hand is for clicks. Sure, including images will improve epc since you have a larger pool of ads to draw from but you will also lose clicks so it balances out. The only WIN situation is when your site shows one of the extremely clickable image ads a lot but those are expensive on the advertiser and campaigns don't last long for these.

Text only for me. I reserve image ads for other locations and lead them to affiliate offers (aka I choose the creative)

leadegroot




msg:4157500
 9:52 am on Jun 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

I'm recently seeing lots of video ads on my site, which I've never had before, and am very pleased with the results. CTR has dropped a smidge, but ECPM is about +50%.
Wish they had tried them sooner!

bwnbwn




msg:4157643
 2:56 pm on Jun 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

I really think the nitch really plays a huge role in what ad type works best. For us the 2 ad unit text ad works. Tried others fell off the planet switched back and back on track. Tried more ads per unit dropped went back to regular 2 ads per unit back up. Tried them all hands down for us is the 2 ads per unit placed within the page text above the fold.
Getting the right place, number of ads per unit, type of ad, and color is all about testing. When you find the right combo best thing to do is stick with it.

wyweb




msg:4157693
 4:25 pm on Jun 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

I really think the nitch really plays a huge role in what ad type works best

Agreed. The demographics of your visitors plays heavily into this as well. Mom and pops are more likely to click on ads than seasoned, tech-savvy surfers.

netmeg




msg:4157697
 4:37 pm on Jun 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

Also, there is a marked difference in quality in between the glossy professional "agency" type image ads, and the ones the advertisers can do themselves with the display ad builder. Obviously I can't directly measure CTR on them. But they just don't look good.

ken_b




msg:4157738
 5:41 pm on Jun 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

My experience has led me to believe that the text only vs text and image vs image only id not a static situation.

So much depends on the ads being run in each ad type at the moment that only the most severe situations warrant any action or changes on the publishers part.

ken_b




msg:4157739
 5:42 pm on Jun 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

duplicate post removed

cien




msg:4157883
 8:33 pm on Jun 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

I'm going to try image ads only to see if they work. If I enable image ads only will video ads appear too or do I have to enable a "video ads" setting somewhere? Thanks guys.

Kickedout




msg:4159264
 3:16 pm on Jun 25, 2010 (gmt 0)

I switched to text only and income remains the same. I'll try to set up only image ads but my understanding is that's only possible touching ad by ad (a lot of work)... and I have no great expectations about it. Seems like no matter what media type nothing results in more savings.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved