homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.122.65
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & jatar k & martinibuster

Google AdSense Forum

    
A message from Google you're all familiar with.
Mixed messages from Google, this one irks me.
JS_Harris

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3496404 posted 2:58 am on Nov 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

As most of you know Google actively puts the screws to sites/pages with affiliate offers. It makes sense to do since only the original offer needs to be displayed in serps and not 50,000+ other pages from the webmasters who promote that offer on their personal sites.

On November 1st Google saw fit to send me tips on improving my income, thank you, but the tip was to load up my site with affiliate offers. The following line irks me.

Referrals is a feature of AdSense that allows you to increase your revenue while increasing your users' awareness of a wide range of products and services.

I hate this type of message from Google because it's quite frankly two-faced. If I add deals from sites other than Google I run the real risk of being punished for doing so by Google in the form of lowered page/site rankings.

Has anything changed? Can I take the Nov 1st message to mean that Google is letting up on the issue or is it yet another request to promote Google only? With smart pricing seemingly increasing and with AdWords mysteriously impacting AdSense revenue I'm one step nearer to trying another network after reading the Nov 1st "tips".

edit: (or perhaps just turning adsense revenue into a YPN campaign)

[edited by: JS_Harris at 2:59 am (utc) on Nov. 5, 2007]

 

koan

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3496404 posted 5:10 am on Nov 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

Google's referral ads are Javascript, so they have no incidence on their search engine ranking. But if you use affiliate content to build a web site or pages, it is natural that their engine would consider it of no value to their users. I don't see any conflict of interest. If you want to use affiliate links to supplement your income, use nofollow attributes and your site will not be penalized.

dibbern2

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3496404 posted 5:33 am on Nov 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

Koan,
I don't think you're correct on that. I believe G records 'no-follows', it just doesn't index them as links. In other words, an affiliate is noted. I think there is a thread explaining this somewhere on the board.

simey

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3496404 posted 6:32 am on Nov 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

But if you use affiliate content to build a web site or pages, it is natural that their engine would consider it of no value to their users.

Yeah, affiliate content is different from affiliate ads IMO.
As long as I have original content and happen to include a relevant affiliate ad (javascript or html), google seems to like my pages just fine. Content (text-copy) supplied by affiliate merchants is guaranteed to be duplicate and of little value.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved