homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.20.220.79
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Google Publishes an Updated Guide To Site Moves
engine




msg:4678471
 11:58 am on Jun 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

Some sites are very complex to move, so any additional help and assistance to ensure consistency in the SERPs is of value, imho.

Few topics confuse and scare webmasters more than site moves. To help you avoid surprises, we've created an in-depth guide on how to handle site moves in a Googlebot-friendly way. So what, exactly, is a site move and how do you go about moving a site correctly?
Basics of site moves
A site move is, broadly, one of two types of content migrations:

Site moves without URL changes. Only the underlying infrastructure serving the website is changed without any visible changes to the URL structure. For example, you might move www.example.com to a different hosting provider while keeping the same URLs and site structure on www.example.com.
Site moves with URL changes. Here, the URLs on the website change in any number of ways:
The protocol: http://www.example.com to https://www.example.com
The domain name: example.com to example.net
The URL paths: http://example.com/page.php?id=1 to http://example.com/widget
Google Publishes an Updated Guide To Site Moves [googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com]

 

chadharnish




msg:4678552
 6:54 pm on Jun 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

I recommend all new site use URLs without platform extensions such as aspx or php. That way, future migrations to other platforms will have zero impact.

site.com/Should/Be/Readable/

LuckyLiz




msg:4678566
 8:03 pm on Jun 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

I wonder why Google recommends using a 302 redirect if you're switching from m.site.com to responisive design on site.com.

Sand




msg:4678570
 8:30 pm on Jun 9, 2014 (gmt 0)


I wonder why Google recommends using a 302 redirect if you're switching from m.site.com to responisive design on site.com.


My guess is that by 302-ing m.site.com, m.site.com will continue to show up as the url in the SERPs, which may entice more mobile clicks.

Just a thought.

graeme_p




msg:4678757
 2:16 pm on Jun 10, 2014 (gmt 0)

It may be a result of interpreting 302's as showing the mobile or desktop (depending on which way its going) version of the same page, which is presumably why they recommend 302s for separate mobile sites.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved