homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 174.129.103.100
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Pitfalls with the "VARY User-Agent" server response
chal00d




msg:4669159
 8:29 am on May 7, 2014 (gmt 0)

I serve up different desktop/mobile optimized html on the same URL, based on a visitor’s device type.

While Google continue to recommend the HTTP Vary: User-Agent header in these cases for mobile specific versions of the page ([youtube.com ]), I'm also aware of issues folks are raising around CDN caching; [searchengineland.com ] / [searchenginewatch.com ] / [orcaman.blogspot.com ]

As this is primarily for Google's benefit, it's been suggested by some infra-types that I *only* return the Vary: User-Agent header when a Google user agent is detected (Googlebot/MobileBot/AdBot).

So here's the thing: as the server header response is not “content” per se I think this could be an okay solution, though I'd like to throw it out to the esteemed WebmasterWorld community and get some additional feedback.

You guys see any issues/problems with implementing this solution?

Cheers!

chal00d

 

goodroi




msg:4669491
 3:33 pm on May 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

To be honest I rarely feel 100% comfortable with any solution because Google seems to be moving towards using non-Googlebot methods to index content. This makes me worry about triggering a false positive with their spam filters maybe not today but who knows what tomorrow will bring.

For my own sites, I try to make the content as similar as possible for all devices & users to avoid or at least minimize the need of using these more complicated headers. The more complicated you make things, the more chance there is for errors or misunderstandings. Depending on your users and situation, you might not even need a dedicated mobile version.

Let's say you aren't lucky and you need to have different versions. I would not limit the vary header to Googlebot because as mentioned IMHO Google seems to be paying more & more attention to non-Googlebot sources.

Ralph_Slate




msg:4669520
 4:57 pm on May 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

What is a non-Googlebot method to index traffic?

levo




msg:4669521
 5:12 pm on May 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

If you serve the same code to the different browsers/devices, you don't need the 'Vary: User-Agent.' Googlebot detects responsive websites without that header.

CaptainSalad2




msg:4669537
 5:36 pm on May 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

I use the OP mobile tactic, funny enough I was only thinking a few hours back today how I wish I didn't need to use it as it does slow the response.

Is the correct terminology of this approach "responsive" or as I prefer "adaptive"? I think of "responsive" as a design that fits any screen width, rather than delivering a unique desktop/mobile version that maintains the same content but servers different mark up (less bloated for mobile, less scripts and such)?

levo




msg:4669577
 7:52 pm on May 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

According to Google, css only solution is 'responsive,' and user-agent based serving is 'dynamic.'

https://developers.google.com/webmasters/smartphone-sites/

CaptainSalad2




msg:4669588
 8:15 pm on May 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the clarification levo!

goodroi




msg:4669609
 9:47 pm on May 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

To clarify: I wouldn't say Google is indexing via non-Googlebot ways but they seem to be moving towards discovering content via non-Googlebot ways. Some potential but unproven ways for Google to do this would be to monitor data served to Chrome users, Android devices or use an non-Google identified robot. Sorry for any confusion.

phranque




msg:4669692
 8:54 am on May 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

the practical purpose of the Vary: User-Agent header is related to data compression of the requested resource.

it's not a matter of serving different content to different User-Agents, it's a matter of whether the text resource served is compressed or uncompressed.

if the resource served is compressed you will need a Vary: Accept-Encoding header, which means a proxy server will cache both gzipped and uncompressed versions and serve the correct version based on the Accept-Encoding request header.
sending the Vary: User-Agent header with responses that may be compressed means a proxy server will cache both gzipped and uncompressed versions and serve the correct version based on the User-Agent request header.

no Vary headers should be sent for MSIE-sourced requests.

CaptainSalad2




msg:4669719
 12:21 pm on May 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

Very useful phranque, thank you!

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved