homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.147.84
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Does WhoIs Privacy impact ranking?
member22

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 12:06 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Is it possible that my ranking is not where it should be do to the fact that i block my real name in who is ?

 

netmeg

WebmasterWorld Senior Member netmeg us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 1:27 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

I doubt it. I do too on many domains.

member22

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 1:35 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

ok just wanted to know

bahi010



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 3:15 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

no no its just a myth

Sand



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 7:01 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

I don't think so, most of my domains are private -- that said, something interesting happened to me a few years ago:

My WhoIs on one site was public, but then I made it private. Within a day or two, my rankings dropped like a rock. I gave it a couple days, and then completely panicked and changed it back to public. Within a day or so, the rankings came back.

I don't think that public vs private has an impact, but I do think there are a couple possibilities:

1. Changing your WhoIs could possibly have an effect in some circumstances (I don't know if it's true, but it sure *felt* true in that case)

2. It was a complete coincidence.

EditorialGuy

WebmasterWorld Senior Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 7:28 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Sure, it's possible. Here's what Eric Schmidt of Google had to say about anonymity a while back:

"Within search results, information tied to verified online profiles will be ranked higher than content without such verification, which will result in most users naturally clicking on the top (verified) results. The true cost of remaining anonymous, then, might be irrelevance."


It's also easy to imagine Google being skeptical of anonymity in some cases but not others. Common sense would suggest that an e-commerce or affiliate site that sent spam signals might get dinged for hiding its owner's identity, while a Chinese political dissident's site might get a pass.

3zero



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 8:20 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

I never believed it made a difference but in the case of manual action against the site then web anonymity might be seen as a spam signal.

member22

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 8:29 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Doesn't Eric Schmidt talk about author rank ? and not who is ?

EditorialGuy

WebmasterWorld Senior Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4637055 posted 9:14 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

He was talking about "verified online profiles" vs. anonymity.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved