homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.205.241.107
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
When are KW-anchors o.k... when spam?
deeper

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 2:24 am on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Hi,
Google seems to be very sensible with KW-anchors. It seems as if using a KW-anchor is already a spam link at half.

When are KW-anchors o.k. for Google when not?
Are there any thumb rules?

 

BeeDeeDubbleU

WebmasterWorld Senior Member beedeedubbleu us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 8:45 am on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

" It seems as if using a KW-anchor is already a spam link at half."

Not sure what you mean?

deeper

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 9:18 am on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Using a KW-anchor seems to signal "higher spam probability" in the eyes of Google.

They often stress for example they don't like articles and press releases with WW-anchors. Some links are o.k. with an URL anchor, but a KW anchor seems to prick up Matt Cutts ears.

For example a signatur link in a forum where I sometimes post or a link on the "recommended links" page of a friend who has the same job. Does an anchor raise the chance of being unnatural in the eyes of Google?

BeeDeeDubbleU

WebmasterWorld Senior Member beedeedubbleu us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 9:38 am on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

From Webmaster guidelines.
Try to use text instead of images to display important names, content, or links. The Google crawler doesn't recognize text contained in images. If you must use images for textual content, consider using the "ALT" attribute to include a few words of descriptive text.

deeper

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 2:21 pm on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Images?

Something mixed up?

BeeDeeDubbleU

WebmasterWorld Senior Member beedeedubbleu us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 3:28 pm on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

No, I was making the point that Google's guidelines still advise us to use linking text rather than images.

jakebohall



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 4:00 pm on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Deeper... Using commercial terms in your anchor text theoretically increases your chance of an unnatural link penalty.

I do not know of any rules of thumb that state when it is okay to use keyword specific anchor text... I believe the biggest question to ask yourself is intent. If it is for SEO, you should avoid it unless it is strongly defensible. If it is for usability, that should be okay. My standing recommendation to webmasters is to leverage their domain name as the anchor text so as to avoid accusations of manipulating rankings for certain terms.

deeper

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4606938 posted 5:28 pm on Sep 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Unfortunately often the linking world is not clearly black or white. Often both seems to be o.k.

I already mentioned two examples:
A signatur link in a forum where I sometimes post and a link on the "recommended links" page of a friend who has the same profession.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved