homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.237.99.131
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Lightest grey text without a penalty?
Tonearm

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 10:36 am on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

Can anyone tell me what is the lightest gray text color I can use on a white background and not be at risk for a Google penalty?

 

phranque

WebmasterWorld Administrator phranque us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 2:38 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

if it's not readable in a manual check then you are at risk.
i would say it should be dark enough to be read by someone with eyes that are fatigued from reviewing spammy sites all day.

chalkywhite



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 4:01 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

Subtle phranque ;)

rish3



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 4:29 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

Google filed a patent on detecting hidden links: [patft.uspto.gov...]

The part that might be relevant for you:

If two colors are not the same...[the algorithm] may determine that the two colors are similar if they are within a configurable range, or a predetermined range, etc. For example, when the colors are represented as color values, server 120 may determine that two colors are similar if their color values are within 50 (or some other value) levels of color of each other.


I assume "50" wasn't completely arbitrary, though it does say "or some other value". I'm also assuming they mean the sum of the difference across the R, G, and B spaces. Some other context I didn't quote implies that the 50 is a base 10, not hex.

You mentioned grey on white, so if it's truly a white background (#ffffff), the minimum grey would be #eeeeee. Personally, that still looks too subtle to me. The color #dddddd on white is clearly readable to me. That represents a decimal difference of 34 for each of R,G, and B, for a total difference of 102. That's twice the example cited in the patent, so I'm assuming it's safe.

phranque

WebmasterWorld Administrator phranque us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 4:35 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

actually the minimum grey would be #FEFEFE

#EEEEEE would be a difference of 51 total, so if you're feeling lucky...

rish3



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 4:44 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

actually the minimum grey would be #FEFEFE


Well, I meant the minimum grey to achieve the difference of 50 decimal and still be "grey".

#EEEEEE would be a difference of 51 total, so if you're feeling lucky...


Hence why I called it the "minimum grey"

phranque

WebmasterWorld Administrator phranque us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 5:07 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

sorry i misunderstood.
good find of that patent, btw!

Tonearm

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 6:51 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

Killer analysis guys. Thank you.

Tonearm

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 6:56 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

Does changing the font-color of default black text on a #ffffff background to #dddddd de-emphasize the text for Google?

rish3



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 7:59 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

Does changing the font-color of default black text on a #ffffff background to #dddddd de-emphasize the text for Google?


I'm guessing, of course, but I don't think color implies emphasis in any fashion. Just a boolean of "hidden" or "not hidden". Emphasis would be via markup (h1, h2, b, ul, strong, etc).

levo

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 12:05 am on Jun 27, 2013 (gmt 0)

On Adsense ad unit settings, anything lighter than #BFBFBF reverts to #828282

lucy24

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4587789 posted 12:16 am on Jun 27, 2013 (gmt 0)

I don't think color implies emphasis in any fashion

I'd be disappointed in google if after all this time they can't tell when {color} and {background-color} are the same-- even if they happen to come in entirely different areas, like

<div class = "meaningless-name">
{lots-of-other-stuff-here-to-lull-algorithm-into-false-sense-of-security}
<p class = "super-important-text">
Words-I-couldn't-fit-into-the-page-any-other-way</p>

corresponding to
div.meaningless-name {background-color: #777;}
and
p.super-important-text {color: #777;}

Within the same declaration it's trivial. Even the css validator flags those.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved