homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.237.71.86
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Short (Abbreviated) vs Long (Non-Abbreviated) directory name
ganeshjacharya




msg:4528609
 4:26 am on Dec 16, 2012 (gmt 0)

Which one is better

example.com/dir/pagename
example.com/directory/pagename

 

tedster




msg:4528762
 9:58 pm on Dec 16, 2012 (gmt 0)

In my experience, it doesn't matter much these days. Keywords in the filepath are a kind of reinforcing signal in today's algorithm, not a direct signal the way they used to be. In fact, lots of sites do well with simply:

example.com/pagename

ganeshjacharya




msg:4528839
 2:41 am on Dec 17, 2012 (gmt 0)

again if a website need to use them

example.com/dir/pagename
example.com/directory/pagename

which one would be better?

the problem with using example.com/directory/pagename is some page names in the same directory could cross over the required length and google starts to show ellipsis (...) in the URL

Robert Charlton




msg:4529105
 10:23 pm on Dec 17, 2012 (gmt 0)

With regard to ranking, it really doesn't make much difference which you use.

The main benefit you get by have the keyword in your filepath is that it gets bolded in the serps if you rank on a keyword that's part of the query. If "directory" turns out to be a very long word, you might want to keep it short for reasons you state. I've abbreviated both directory names and filenames. IMO, ranking effects by having the keyword in the path are miniscule.

Having the url truncated in the Google snippet area is a problem only if someone copies and pastes it, not likely to happen, but I suppose possible.

aakk9999




msg:4529113
 10:48 pm on Dec 17, 2012 (gmt 0)

Having the url truncated in the Google snippet area is a problem only if someone copies and pastes it, not likely to happen, but I suppose possible.

I found this to be a problem because of scrapers, in which case Google actually picks up such URLs and requests them.
Now, such URLs *should* be returning 404, but I also found that this is not always the case - depending on where ... are, some CMS incorrectly return a page which is then a duplicate.

ganeshjacharya




msg:4529184
 4:34 am on Dec 18, 2012 (gmt 0)

The main benefit you get by have the keyword in your filepath is that it gets bolded


does that give an advantage as far as ranking a page/directory is concerned?

tedster




msg:4529185
 4:38 am on Dec 18, 2012 (gmt 0)

No, but it does attract the user's eye. That may improve the number of Google users who actually click on your listing, wherever you rank.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved