g1smd
msg:4480929 | 1:59 pm on Aug 1, 2012 (gmt 0) |
It's a few years since Google last numbered their search results.
|
lucy24
msg:4481041 | 6:16 pm on Aug 1, 2012 (gmt 0) |
Oh, interesting. I thought you were talking about the "cd" parameter in the referer string. Do you suppose they've done market research and established that the average g### user can't count to ten?
|
onebuyone
msg:4481044 | 6:28 pm on Aug 1, 2012 (gmt 0) |
Sooner or later the count will start from first AdWords ad.
|
shamza
msg:4481061 | 7:31 pm on Aug 1, 2012 (gmt 0) |
check if u didn't download any chrome extension of counting.....does it still showing the count in incognito window?
|
levo
msg:4481116 | 11:40 pm on Aug 1, 2012 (gmt 0) |
Google has been using '<ol>' for its search results. It looks like a CSS issue.
|
rustybrick
msg:4481213 | 11:30 am on Aug 2, 2012 (gmt 0) |
Must be an extension. :)
|
Andem
msg:4481215 | 11:34 am on Aug 2, 2012 (gmt 0) |
It appears to be broken CSS from what I can see.
|
sunnyujjawal
msg:4481493 | 4:21 am on Aug 3, 2012 (gmt 0) |
@rustybrick: it's not an extension, i had checked it twice. If it is an extension feature why it doesn't show the position number on every search result, i found it on one or two search results only.
|
lucy24
msg:4481506 | 5:49 am on Aug 3, 2012 (gmt 0) |
| Google has been using '<ol>' for its search results. It looks like a CSS issue. |
|
I'll be darned. Never realized that. g###'s stylesheet is not exactly easy to read; it's a solid 70000 characters made of close to 1000 separate declarations. (Hard to compare, but mine has to be less than 1/10 that-- and that's generic styles for groups of pages, not just the Results page.) I think there's at least one external stylesheet too, but I can't find the link.
| .gbxx {display: none !important} |
|
(Spacing mine.) Gosh, that makes me curious about what "gbxx" is. Can't find it attached to anything but
<h2 class=gbxx>Account Options</h2>
which hardly seems worth making such a fuss about ;)
| .gbtcb{position: absolute; visibility: hidden} |
|
Oh, n/m, there are a total of 34 items set to "display: none" --five of them !important-- with a further 12 "visibility: hidden". Can't possibly hunt them all down. Besides, most of them don't even occur on the page.
There are a heck of a lot of !importants. To me this suggests imperfect attention to cascading. Heh, heh.
Anyway, it says-- at least in the version spit out for my browser on my IP with the selected query etc.--
Sunny, has someone been messing about with personal stylesheets in your browser? Never used one myself, but some people swear by them.
|
|
