homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.161.192.130
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Will blocking profiles help with a Panda recovery?
seoN00B



 
Msg#: 4474452 posted 2:21 am on Jul 11, 2012 (gmt 0)

I'm struggling a bit on recovering from Panda.

I managed to recover 20% only of the loss.


My question is by blocking the profiles on the website is it advisable?

Eg.
website.com/member=1212

 

tedster

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4474452 posted 11:23 am on Jul 11, 2012 (gmt 0)

I've heard of people making this part of their Panda recovery work, but never heard of it being the only action taken and that it then caused a recovery. I personally find it unlikely to be the issue that causes a Panda demotion, but I suppose it might if the proportion of profile pages is large compared to other content.

I'd look at a couple of factors - whether the profile pages would provide real value in a search result, and whether there are lots of profile pages that are basically inactive shells.

It's not clear what kind of site you are running, however some people have exposed their forum member profiles to search only after a certain level of involvement - and therefore a certain level of content depth for the profile page.

seoN00B



 
Msg#: 4474452 posted 3:42 am on Jul 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the reply Ted.
I'm running a Classified Ads Portal.

Seems like the profiles has no real value on the search and i dont want it to appear as well on the search engine.

BashrO



 
Msg#: 4474452 posted 2:24 pm on Jul 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Try to condition the visibility,
"if member wrote XX words in about then make profile indexed"

or something like that.

blackhatsejournalist



 
Msg#: 4474452 posted 5:55 pm on Jul 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

How about facebook?
I made a search with my name + the keyword facebook and I get 18,700,000 profiles.

Was facebook hit by penguin?, I don't think so...

Elsmarc

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4474452 posted 6:27 pm on Jul 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Facebook is entirely different than mom&pop-website-example.com. Trying to equate Facebook to a "mom&pop" site isn't valid.

realmaverick

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4474452 posted 6:28 pm on Jul 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Not all of those are results from Facebook.

The OP is talking about Panda.

Facebook doesn't rely on Google for their traffic.

I have all of my profiles noindex, follow.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved