Msg#: 4468697 posted 3:28 pm on Jun 23, 2012 (gmt 0)
Yes ..I mentioned in a recent thread , Ehow is back in the top 5 for very many terms for which it was demoted last year immediately after the first run of Panda..
It seems the key is to have exact match titles and poorly written articles that link to very similar poorly written articles on the same topic, that have only slight variations.
Yep , either both major SEs have dialed back the "remove the human scraped / human respun short word wiki crap" ..or Ehow for short..because it makes G ( at least ) bazillions in adsense ..Google could terminate all the other adsense publishers and buy Ehow, and just keep all the adsense money "in house"..
Or the SE's really don't care that Ehow is ripping off everyone else's IP..and know that the rest of us could never afford the legal fees to stop them ourselves..as they'd starve us to death while they stalled in the courts..
Msg#: 4468697 posted 6:26 pm on Jun 23, 2012 (gmt 0)
Well, I just don't see why people who are experts in their field are going to continue to write quality content when they will be outranked by a plagiarized article written by some 17 year old kid trying to earn some weed money.
Msg#: 4468697 posted 8:23 pm on Jun 23, 2012 (gmt 0)
planet they are not. Personally I have given up entirely. Forget the internet as we used to know it, its over. I am being slammed by sites using my content and a backlink catalouge of paid blog links, been that way since panda.
Msg#: 4468697 posted 5:38 pm on Jun 24, 2012 (gmt 0)
...seems to be owned by the content farms
You mean owned by content farms, or by The Content Farm? Because I do see Ehow everywhere, but many other, smaller content farms that used to rank pre-Panda are nowhere to be found.
You know, when you steal others content, you need to steal on a really large scale in order to get away with it. That's true I guess not only for content. All industries, Wall Street included, work the same way ...