| 3:20 pm on Jun 16, 2012 (gmt 0)|
Maybe I'm confused, but wasn't there a thread about this a couple of months ago? If my memory is correct, the OP of that thread said that a photo of his face reduced the CTR, but a product photo increased CTR. Then there was a discussion about whether using a product photo is against the G+ rules.
| 3:33 pm on Jun 16, 2012 (gmt 0)|
Yes, they do. Unfortunately. I resent Google for making me do it too.
| 11:29 pm on Jun 16, 2012 (gmt 0)|
In my experience it does help, but I have an eye-catching G+ photograph (it has a lot of color and contrast). If yours is dull or creepy, it probably won't do you any favors.
| 11:31 pm on Jun 16, 2012 (gmt 0)|
I must have missed that thread. The results make sense to me.
Let's see if rusty brick wants to ask them straight out if it violates their guidelines.
| 11:34 pm on Jun 16, 2012 (gmt 0)|
No need to ask Google, it's pretty clear in their authorship guidelines:
"Make sure you have a profile photo with a recognizable headshot."
| 3:25 pm on Jun 18, 2012 (gmt 0)|
Sand well mine is a picture of leamur it's a head shot right :-)