homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.17.7.84
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Google launches GoMo - converts a site to mobile friendly
dertyfern




msg:4462809
 5:41 am on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

This is damn smart of Google. They've launched GoMo which converts your existing site into mobile friendly:

Our new do-it-yourself site builder, powered by DudaMobile and customized specifically for GoMo users, easily converts regular websites into mobile-friendly sites in five simple steps. And it allows you to add features like a click-to-call button, mobile maps and Google AdSense and Analytics. [howtogomo.com ]

 

engine




msg:4462819
 6:46 am on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

Interestingly, Google launched this initiative November last year.

GoMo: Helping businesses create a mobile friendly website [googlemobileads.blogspot.co.uk]
...we’re launching an initiative called GoMo that helps businesses “Go Mobile”.

lucy24




msg:4462820
 6:49 am on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

Would be still smarter if the site weren't run by AWS-- using a random selection of IPs including 107.22 and 174.29. So you have to run around and do some temporary unblocking just to see what they're about.

n00b1




msg:4462828
 7:38 am on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

I don't actually like 'mobile friendly' sites. I much prefer looking at the full thing and get annoyed when I am redirected to a cut down version on my iPad or smartphone. Mobile WIkipedia is particularly annoying. I'm not alone in thinking most mobile devices these days can handle the 'full fat' web. It depends on data allowances I suppose but a bit of prudence works for me.

Harry




msg:4462884
 11:31 am on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

I found the best solution is to offer a mobile-friendly version with links easy to locate by users as well as a responsive design site which adapts to the screen size. The mobile-friendly site is still needed for users who just cannot download the bigger site.

nomis5




msg:4462888
 11:53 am on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

Full sites which have not been designed for mobile viewing (the vast majority) require lots of finger resizing to actually be readable.

I suppose it all depends on what type of sites are being accessed. Information sites that have miniscule type on a mobile are painful, you want readable, brief information and you want it quick. Full sites on a mobile don't give that.

netmeg




msg:4462904
 12:23 pm on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

There's also the issue of ads, if you are ad supported. Google wants people to jump on responsive design but doesn't serve responsive ads (AdWords/AdSense)

HuskyPup




msg:4462938
 1:37 pm on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

a responsive design site which adapts to the screen size


Yep, I have two .mobi sites like this, one to strict .mobi coding the other a hybrid design and works on anything.

I'm glad I constructed these, and didn't pay for them, since they are hardly used whatsoever, well under 1% of my overall visitors. I don't know why but for whatever reason people just do not click through to the mobile sites.

My normal sites do display correctly even on small smart phones, just not my niche's popularity I guess.

FWIW the site I see being used the most on phones is Wikipedia, we're always checking that in the pub during beer conversations:-)

travelin cat




msg:4462953
 2:00 pm on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

I'm wondering how these mobile sites would work on a website that is updated and added to on a regular basis. Would the mobile version have to be rebuilt? If a page's content changes, would the mobile site reflect that?

henry0




msg:4462963
 2:25 pm on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

I'm wondering how these mobile sites would work on a website that is updated and added to on a regular basis. Would the mobile version have to be rebuilt? If a page's content changes, would the mobile site reflect that?


So, we don't know if it is dynamic?
I didn't even looked at it, but as per your statement it does not look encouraging.

travelin cat




msg:4462969
 3:08 pm on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

Henry, I have only looked at the demo, I have not tried it on any of my sites. Their site does not have many details that I could find to answer many of my questions.

henry0




msg:4462972
 3:21 pm on Jun 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

Thanks, I might try it this WE, only if I will able to get rid of it if not happy with the result.

Swanny007




msg:4463245
 3:29 am on Jun 9, 2012 (gmt 0)

I actually have one site using GoMo/Duda. It's actually a really good option if you have a mostly simple HTML site. If you use a forum or other scripts it gets tricky fast.

I also have one site that uses a mobile-detection php script and serves a mobile-friendly CSS style and smaller AdSense ads, so mobile users get the mobile friendly site without an option for the full site. However they aren't missing a thing, the site is pretty simple and straightforward.

I'm going to use the php mobile detection script on other sites because long-term I don't want to keep using a separate m. subdomain for the mobile site.

Broadway




msg:4463477
 11:02 pm on Jun 9, 2012 (gmt 0)

I'm no fan of mobile sites. I agree with n00b1, they're often dumbed down. What I really hate about them is they often fix the font size. (With a "full" site you can zoom in on the text on a smart phone.)

Since half or more of all mobile phones being sold now are smart phones (I think I'm right with that stat), I personally thought the whole designed-for-mobile thing (like how Wiki or IMDB implements it) would fade away. I guess I'm wrong.

vik_c




msg:4463511
 2:58 am on Jun 10, 2012 (gmt 0)


Since half or more of all mobile phones being sold now are smart phones (I think I'm right with that stat), I personally thought the whole designed-for-mobile thing (like how Wiki or IMDB implements it) would fade away. I guess I'm wrong.

The screens will remain small for a while unless they find some way to fold and unfold screens of mobile phones. That limits the text that can be seen.


Is GoMo compatible with the most used CMS solutions; Drupal, Joomla, WordPress etc?

henry0




msg:4463554
 11:36 am on Jun 10, 2012 (gmt 0)

Is GoMo compatible with the most used CMS solutions; Drupal, Joomla, WordPress etc?

We are back to my previous question, as we need to figure if GoMo may deal with dynamic site.

travelin cat




msg:4463582
 2:05 pm on Jun 10, 2012 (gmt 0)

I ran one of my Joomla sites thru it. Unacceptable results. The dynamic menus were rendered as a long list of links. I can't see how it could do any better without some major tweaking.

I can see how it would be useful for small non-dynamic sites, but anything even slightly complicated would require a better solution... Most ikely coding by hand.

henry0




msg:4463586
 2:31 pm on Jun 10, 2012 (gmt 0)

Thanks, so it is pretty much useless as nowadays the vast majority of sites are dynamic.
I have a dynamic site, CSS based and without any redirect or any added features it is well readable on a smart phone, (not concerned with regular cell phone)

mrguy




msg:4465340
 6:31 am on Jun 14, 2012 (gmt 0)

This is no big deal.

It cannot come close to true mobile development. With PhoneGap, you can build for mobile and the deploy native apps for submittal to various app stores.

And you can utilize various functions of the mobile device such as accelerometer, phone, database, etc.

That's much more impressive than GoMo.. I could see a small business person who is not a professional trying to save buck tinker with it, but that's about it.

Google really needs to quit trying to take over anything and everything and turn their focus back to their search engine which is sorely lacking these days.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved