Brian0275
msg:4449481 | 4:29 pm on May 4, 2012 (gmt 0) |
People have reported that helping. Probably worth AT LEAST testing especially if you have been beat down by the recent algo changes.
|
Scotch
msg:4449622 | 8:45 pm on May 4, 2012 (gmt 0) |
I'm doing some of that for a number of my sites. Not deleting all of them but quite a few and those I leave, I'm removing keyword anchor text in favor of brand only name. I'm seeing some sites get a bump in rankings. At the very least, you're falling more in line with Google guidelines about link schemes... so probably a good thing.
|
cnvi
msg:4449657 | 9:54 pm on May 4, 2012 (gmt 0) |
So by removing your link resource pages, you are letting the search engines dictate that you can only receive traffic through them and not from relevant link exchanges within your realm of interest.
Since when was it illegal for Delta to link to AMEX and AMEX link back to Delta?
Why are we giving the search engines so much power?
|
epmaniac
msg:4449817 | 11:49 am on May 5, 2012 (gmt 0) |
have u guys looked at olx.com ?
they are a huge group of site and their country specific domains link back to each other.............
do u guys think that they would suffer because of current penguin update or this type of link building is allowed?
isnt this a type of reciprocal linking also?
|
|
