Hissingsid
msg:4380858 | 8:31 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| Call Google, tell them your secret and ask for a job. |
|
More like Call Google and tell them if they don't give you a job you'll tell a few carefully selected SEO's.
|
greenleaves
msg:4380867 | 8:51 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I'd use it hard and fast and cashout while I can. Then sell an ebook on how I did it :0
I'm thinking niches; ecig, casino, p00rn, pills, forex, penny stocks, make money online, etc
|
dunivan
msg:4380876 | 9:00 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I would share it, have others test it, and then take the deserved credit for discovering it.
|
wrldtrv
msg:4380880 | 9:24 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I would email it to [EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED]
|
CainIV
msg:4380884 | 9:37 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
You've already told too many people.
Expect one of the major news portals to carry the story by Monday.
|
Dot_Media
msg:4380901 | 10:31 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
find the most search for term on the net.
make landing page.
rank #1
take millions.
move out of country
|
MrFewkes
msg:4380912 | 10:59 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
The clue is in his post "which competes with mine".
Its a doddle.
|
Gemini23
msg:4380922 | 11:53 pm on Oct 28, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I really do question whether it is possible to out rank ANY other website with just ONE simple 'trick' or thing... it just isn't possible. BUT... and this is the big BUT.. key phrase in the first post.. "... competes with me" yes but how many other sites 'compete with you'? because IF your website is such a tight niche then yes it would/should be possible to outrank anyone.. but would it work with several million competing websites... I somehow think not...
|
shoreline
msg:4380927 | 12:05 am on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Don't tell anyone and ponder on it for a few weeks, let it make you feel special and post a response soon that you found out it wasn't really working after all. When you're done with that, ponder on it some more :)
|
Rockyou
msg:4381004 | 7:11 am on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Drall i have a high respect for you, Stop posting these silly messages, I am into SEO for very long time, I know how Google search engine works, The trick you are telling will hardly take you few positions not No.1. There are no major loopholes in Google search engine, I can assure you & everyone.
|
anand84
msg:4381047 | 11:07 am on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Don't tell
Don't overdo. Rank for your main term, and stay that way. Overdoing it on all your pages, creating multiple low content easy-to-build pages in the hope of making as much money while you can is going to kill the golden goose.
|
Dinkar
msg:4381066 | 12:04 pm on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| There are no major loopholes in Google search engine, I can assure you & everyone. |
|
I don't know how much truth is there in Drall's claim. But there are some major loopholes in Google SE. OK, it may not as easy as Drall claim but still easy to rank, if you know how to do it.
|
londrum
msg:4381067 | 12:12 pm on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
drall has probably just got his personalised search switched on. visit your site 100 times and you rise to the top -- a miracle!
|
oddsod
msg:4381087 | 1:49 pm on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| There are no major loopholes in Google search engine, I can assure you & everyone. |
|
Finally someone from Google to put an end to the rumours!
|
indyank
msg:4381093 | 2:08 pm on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
guess it is time for this thread to be locked...the fun i had is by doing a Google search for "web or webcrawler or av" with and without double quotes and seeing the results...
it does look like you can rank above others for certain keywords, even with content that you don't own, if you know how to do it ;)
|
HuskyPup
msg:4381121 | 4:08 pm on Oct 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| the fun i had is by doing a Google search |
|
Lol, excellent, and yet again another WordPress blog. Well done Google, another perfect example of the original being outranked!
|
brinked
msg:4381280 | 4:51 am on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I haven't been this let down since +1 was released.
|
arikgub
msg:4381298 | 7:21 am on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| the fun i had is by doing a Google search for "web or webcrawler or av" |
|
| it does look like you can rank above others for certain keywords, even with content that you don't own, if you know how to do it |
|
It's not about knowing "how to do it" - it is about the brand bias. Search for "web or nike or av" and you will see.
|
indyank
msg:4381308 | 9:05 am on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
brinked, do you see any +1 for experts? I do see a sixer for rusty..
|
Gemini23
msg:4381330 | 12:00 pm on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
What I don't understand is why is this the "Featured Home Page Discussion"?
When I submitted an article last week (to newinventionsofalifetime dot com) about to how to design a car that didn't need ANY fuel or energy to run it, it never got a mention....
|
Leosghost
msg:4381331 | 12:05 pm on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| What I don't understand is why is this the "Featured Home Page Discussion"? |
|
clickbait ? ..;-)
|
bumpski
msg:4381342 | 1:32 pm on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
drall
Just like webmasterworld uses honey pots to catch bots, so may Google. It must be very easy for Google to hunt down optimizers and experimenters. So why not set up a trap!
Just like publishers purposely misspell words to check for copyright infringement, Google may purposely set up weaknesses in their algo, but really only to catch over-optimizers.
Given what they've done in the past, Panda, and "tweaks" like the Oct 13th change, may just be to see what floats to the top, so they can then poor off the foam! It seems like they do periodically generate really bad results, perhaps it's on purpose. (Knowing Adsense characteristics, they probably earn more money when they run that purposeful kind of self degrading test.) (I'll probably get a lot of comments about this far fetched hypothesis; speculation is fun!)
If you use your trick too much you may be just taking Google's bate!
Uh oh, something to think about! Could be too good to be true!
|
pageoneresults
msg:4381344 | 1:54 pm on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Suckers!
|
Errioxa
msg:4381400 | 6:45 pm on Oct 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I discovered a bug in WMT 4 years ago.
I could see all the backlinks of any domain.
The first, I extracted all relevant data for me, after I published it on a spanish forum, and after I wrote a comment in Matt's blog
[goo.gl ]
This bug would have been discovered sooner or later by someone else, so I decided publish it.
Google never said anything about it, but I had more relevance in the Spanish seo, this helped me get a better job
This was my experience, I think I did the right thing for me.
|
dunivan
msg:4381594 | 1:44 pm on Oct 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| There are no major loopholes in Google search engine, I can assure you & everyone. |
|
Not entirely true.
|
danwhitehouse
msg:4381623 | 2:51 pm on Oct 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I'd be very interested to know what software you are using to conduct your tests and whether it is available on the marketplace or custom made.
|
smartpc
msg:4381684 | 4:43 pm on Oct 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I have found lots of bank atm`s everywhere, everytime I put a plastic card in em they give me money.lol
|
rlange
msg:4381721 | 5:37 pm on Oct 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Rockyou wrote:
There are no major loopholes in Google search engine, I can assure you & everyone. |
|
Good news. Now, since there are no majorly exploitable flaws in Google's various algorithms, when can we expect detailed guidelines on what we, as webmasters, need to do (and not do) to create sites that Google deems worthy?
--
Ryan
|
pageoneresults
msg:4381736 | 6:25 pm on Oct 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
| When can we expect detailed guidelines on what we, as webmasters, need to do (and not do) to create sites that Google deems worthy? |
|
Start here with the HTML Instructions...
HTML and XHTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0
[W3.org...]
Don't let the title fool you, it's a step by step guide for on page SEO. What you see and what you don't see.
|
shortbus1662
msg:4381794 | 8:04 pm on Oct 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
I sure hope if you really did find this way, that you have spent the last 5 days or however long it's been making tons of money.
You'll regret winning the lottery and not cashing in that ticket.
You basically got a golden ticket into the Chocolate Factory. Man I love me some of that kind of chocolate.
|
tictoc
msg:4381885 | 12:29 am on Nov 1, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Seems to me the right thing to do is post it in the supporters forum... isn't that what the mods are supposed to say instead of don't post anything lol
Finally someone from Google to put an end to the rumours! |
|
Who are you referring to?
|
| This 96 message thread spans 4 pages: < < 96 ( 1 2 [3] 4 ) > > |
|
|
