homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.213.10
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Will Short-lived backlinks help SEO?
anand84




msg:4353036
 12:03 pm on Aug 18, 2011 (gmt 0)

We have a highly popular homepage (PR 6/7) that we are looking to use in promoting a section with a page for every kind of widget. This section has a few thousand pages but not much search engine presence for the individual keywords.

So, what we thought was that we will have a box on the homepage that shows the 'Latest searched widgets' and display the latest 10 widget pages that have been visited. The idea is that since the homepage has a good search engine presence, this will help in giving link juice (as well as frequent spidering) to all those widget pages that appear on the homepage when the googlebot comes spidering.

The only downside is that this box will be dynamically updated with the latest searched widgets. Consequently, the presence of the independent pages on the homepage will be short-lived.

Is this a problem or do you think widget pages that are spidered from the homepage should have no trouble ranking better?

 

Marketing Guy




msg:4353048
 12:33 pm on Aug 18, 2011 (gmt 0)

You're looking at different snapshots in time - when Google indexes your homepage that links to 10 internal pages, those will rank a bit better for a while (until the page is indexed again and the PageRank of the target pages are recalculated).

So it would be short lived and chances are it might not even be noticable. Depends on a bunch of other factors. High competition areas for example would mean that the little boost wouldn't be enough to jump up a position.

There's also the question whether or not the loss of the link would count as an additional negative factor, causing the pages then to drop lower in rankings. I've seen this happen on large sites (but in a different manner to what you are describing).

To be honest, the only reason I've ever displayed random links is to get deep content in larger sites indexed a bit faster.

IMO if you want the ranking boost, then link to your most popular pages permanently. That keeps the busy pages ranking well (and perhaps link from them down to poorer performing pages). The permanent approach is always going to be better than juggling the pages around.

Scott

SEOMike




msg:4353106
 2:44 pm on Aug 18, 2011 (gmt 0)

There's also the question whether or not the loss of the link would count as an additional negative factor

Exactly. The boost will be short-lived. There is a lot of info contained in Google Patent App #20070094255 [google.com] about link acquisition vs link decay. It's a real good read.

The permanent approach is always going to be better than juggling the pages around.

If you have enough traffic your rotating links will show you which products convert the best and then you can look at profit margins on them. Put up permalinks to the ones that perform best.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved