aristotle
msg:4345496 | 4:35 pm on Jul 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
If this is correct, it's rather surprising. I read somewhere that membership in Google+ is growing at a rapid rate. If membership is growing, then traffic should also be growing.
|
engine
msg:4345500 | 4:58 pm on Jul 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
FYI
Google+ Traffic Watchers Statistics
[webmasterworld.com]
|
Shatner
msg:4345955 | 5:52 pm on Jul 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
The traffic I am receiving from Google + is down something like 50%. Interest in it has really died off.
|
tangor
msg:4345984 | 9:02 pm on Jul 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
The bloom is off the rose. And like Amorphophallus titanum*, has not been well-received as regards the sniff test.
*look it up
|
Pjman
msg:4346005 | 10:58 pm on Jul 31, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Google+ is really just G's Management team running scared from Facebook. There PR team team is huffing and puffing that they are going to be superior because they will roll all G products into one.
Google still isn't the King of active web based email accounts (A LA Hotmail and Yahoo) It took years for them even to crack 25% of the market.
I think Facebook is more than safe in the space as long as they keep being innovative and listening to their users.
It took my 55 year old mom 2 hours to setup her facebook and months to really figure out how to use it. Think she is going to want to jump ship? Many people have the same situation.
|
jmccormac
msg:4346141 | 11:27 am on Aug 1, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Perhaps it got Pandalized. :>
Regards...jmcc
|
Robert Charlton
msg:4346415 | 11:15 pm on Aug 1, 2011 (gmt 0) |
How much of Google+ traffic is marketers marketing to other marketers?
I'm thinking that this may be true of early adopters of social media in general, but it might be particularly true of Google+.
|
|
