homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.252.142
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Google ranks Dogpile the most relevant for "search engine"
kidder




msg:4321345
 11:08 pm on Jun 2, 2011 (gmt 0)

From time to time I Google the term "search engine" and currently dogpile ranks as the most relevant result. Does this mean that Panda hit Google (#10 on my results) and they are waiting for a recovery?

 

browsee




msg:4321385
 11:53 pm on Jun 2, 2011 (gmt 0)

Perfect! Showing #11 for me. According to Google "The Panda update was supposed to lower the ranking of lower or poorer quality sites."

ziajunu




msg:4321387
 11:59 pm on Jun 2, 2011 (gmt 0)

oh! very interesting

HuskyPup




msg:4321389
 12:09 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Now I'm a very happy chappy! Not that they will get any pain from it!

miozio




msg:4321395
 1:12 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Wow, they guessed it right this time

brinked




msg:4321396
 1:17 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

not to rain on anyones parade here, but why would google rank themselves for search engine? If you go to google and do a search, you already know google is an option, so why should it appear as a result?

Google has become much more than a search engine, it has become the replacement word for the word search. Nobody says search for it anymore, they say "google it". This is the exact reason why msn moved to bing rather than msn/live.com. "bing it" sounds better than live it or msn it.

wheel




msg:4321400
 1:54 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Actually, my kids don't say 'google it'. They say 'search it up on the internet'. I've found that curious.

kidder




msg:4321405
 2:18 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

But Google does appear as a result, its not the most relevant option according to their own algorithm.. Given search is their bread and butter I would have expected them to rank a little higher for it.

supercyberbob




msg:4321406
 2:20 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

That's what she said.

brinked




msg:4321409
 2:48 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

google doesnt appear as a result for me. result 11 is a google chrome help page.

lucy24




msg:4321410
 2:52 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

All the other sites' blurbs-- including wikipedia and ask.com-- contain the actual word "engine", so google is fudging it by listing themselves at all. ("This term occurs only in pages that link to this site", I guess.) Where the word is located on the respective search engines' real pages that real humans get if they click on the link is a bit of a mystery. But I'm sure google can explain it.

Edit: Dogpile lists bing first. And vice versa.

londrum




msg:4321464
 8:54 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

not much point ranking yourself for "search engine" when people are searching for it on your own search engine. the searcher is obviously looking for ANOTHER search engine, so it kinda makes sense.

indyank




msg:4321469
 9:28 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

so it makes sense to show dogpile and not the ones many would expect, is it what you are saying?

HuskyPup




msg:4321475
 9:41 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

I hadn't realised dogpile was still in existence and trying it out what a load of poopoo, Google actually looked reasonable!

superclown2




msg:4321482
 9:59 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Any search engine that lists dogpile as the top search engine obviously has a broken algorithm.

goodroi




msg:4321490
 10:19 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Any search engine that lists dogpile as the top search engine obviously has a broken algorithm.

Using that logic Bing, Yahoo and Google all have broken algorithms.

You may want to take a moment and ask yourself why does this matter?

If you are just spending time complaining or laughing at Google then you are not improving your personal situation or rankings. If you are trying to better understand the serps and reverse engineer them so you can make smarter and more profitable decisions I would suggest you look at other keywords that are better for analyzing.

HuskyPup




msg:4321513
 11:09 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Oh dear, someone with a hangover this morning? :-)

Pjman




msg:4321522
 11:50 am on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Wow, I have proof that Google is actually right on this one.

My company did an experiment (back in May) with teachers and they rated the top 10 results of (G, Bing, Dogpile, Blekko, and Ask).

Dogpile came in first over 5 different groups and 5 separate experiments.

I would post the link to our results, so you can see the data, but I think it's against WebmasterWorld terms.

superclown2




msg:4321546
 1:53 pm on Jun 3, 2011 (gmt 0)

Oh dear, someone with a hangover this morning? :-)

I couldn't have put it better myself <G>

The day we can't have a laugh as well as be serious is the day I'm going to head for the next world. And I am NOT ready for that yet, by any stretch.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved