homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 174.129.103.100
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Duplicate titles and metas in GWT. Should I be concerned?
htdawg




msg:4280134
 10:29 am on Mar 11, 2011 (gmt 0)

I just checked GWT and saw my site has duplicate title & metas
caused from a link on a site that when clicked on shows up as this http://www.example.com/?source=www.example.com

should I be concerned that it might affect my site?

 

tedster




msg:4280441
 9:52 pm on Mar 11, 2011 (gmt 0)

Duplicate titles and meta descriptions make it harder for Google to rank your pages appropriately. I'd say fix it.

HuskyPup




msg:4280443
 9:55 pm on Mar 11, 2011 (gmt 0)

should I be concerned that it might affect my site?


Defintely be concerned.

rhornsby




msg:4280511
 1:42 am on Mar 12, 2011 (gmt 0)

More importantly, you should simply fix it. As either you have a canonical problem where Google is recognizing the same page as two separate pages because you don't provide a canonical page. Or you simply have the same Title and/or description on two separate pages. Either way they are easy fixes that Google WMT usually recognizes within a month of being fixed.

htdawg




msg:4281791
 7:18 am on Mar 15, 2011 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the replies, The easiest way to fix the problem would be to simply remove my listing/link from the site that has it. right? How can I fix a canonical issue from my end If I cant get them to remove the link? Do I use this tag rel="canonical" on my index page?

tedster




msg:4281795
 7:39 am on Mar 15, 2011 (gmt 0)

Yes, that's a decent quick fix. Just use <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/"/>

More complex would be using a 301 redirect to remove the query strings. If you're not using any query strings, that's probably a better way to go. But if you are using some query strings, then it gets more complex - doable but complicated.

TheMadScientist




msg:4281803
 8:03 am on Mar 15, 2011 (gmt 0)

Actually, stripping all the query_strings is not that much more complex ... It can be done with a couple of lines in the .htaccess, and could easily be added to the canonicalization or other redirects ... ? at the end of the redirect strips it, so all that has to happen is a ? to be added to the current redirect locations and a condition added to the www non-www canonicalization that checks for a query string ... and it probably sounds more complicated to read about than it is.

You're right it is a bit more complicated, but not very much imo ... And, yes, the real 'complication' comes in if you need to remove 'most' but not the rest.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved