homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.235.36.164
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe to WebmasterWorld
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Considering My Own Shortened URLs - Any Issues?
HuskyPup




msg:4229299
 7:09 pm on Nov 11, 2010 (gmt 0)

I've been considering for quite some time the idea of inserting on each specific product page my own shortened url. Currently most of my urls look like:

example.com/country/widget/specific-widget.html

I would show on the product page my company's own 4 letter acronym:

LLLL.tld/abc123

Can anyone think of any obvious reason why there may be any issues doing this apart from confusing G even more?

 

goodroi




msg:4229521
 10:54 am on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

url shorteners use either a 302 or 301 redirect. i think we can all agree that massive 302 redirects can create headaches. as for 301 redirects, they do not pass 100% of the link pop. also multiple redirects can cause issues.

not to mention you are making your main site semi-dependent on another domain, which you might unexpectedly lose control of (see libya taking back certain .ly websites)

personally i probably wouldnt do it. for most sites i do not see enough benefit. i can think of one or two unique situations were this could be a good idea.

HuskyPup




msg:4229576
 2:50 pm on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

Yep, I just knew I was missing something basic!

Planet13




msg:4229593
 3:35 pm on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

@goodroi

as for 301 redirects, they do not pass 100% of the link pop. also multiple redirects can cause issues.


Could you elaborate on these two issues?

What circumstances cause a 301 not to pass 100% page rank?

How / when do multiple 301s cause issues?

Thanks in advance.

goodroi




msg:4229598
 3:53 pm on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

hi planet13,

according to matt cutts (and my own personal experience) there is some link evaporation going on with 301 redirects. it is not a huge loss. i believe this first became public knowledge when eric enge interviewed matt cutts in march 2010.

netmeg




msg:4229625
 5:01 pm on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

I use 'em. Some urls are just too freakin' long for email, twitter, etc. Specially on CMS or Ecommerce packages that tack on lotsa categories.

Right now I'm using a service with one of my own short domains; it is my hope to "roll my own" before too long - there are a number of PHP packages out there, but so far I haven't been able to get one to work on my server. I know it's out there. I just haven't found it yet.

BradleyT




msg:4229679
 7:09 pm on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

So wait, page A of your site has a link to page B of your site and you want to use a shortener for that link?

netmeg




msg:4229683
 7:12 pm on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

Oh, I missed that. No, I don't think I'd use them on internal links.

brotherhood of LAN




msg:4229689
 7:34 pm on Nov 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

Just for reference, here's the 301 Redirect Means "Some Loss of PageRank" - says Mr Cutts [webmasterworld.com] thread.

Alex_TJ




msg:4238058
 10:20 pm on Dec 2, 2010 (gmt 0)

We use our own special shortened URLs e.g. ourdomain.tld/BandBWF which redirects to ourdomain.tld/big-and-blue-widget-foo.
It's not on our website but for our brochures, both printed and PDFs to help type-ins and get people straight to the relevant part of our site.
Is that what you're talking about Husky?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved