homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.163.91.250
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Inconsistancy in indexation reports
sleidia




msg:4131702
 12:15 am on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

Hello,

On Google Webmasters Tool, I have 53 indexed urls but my site contains 61 urls.
But when I do site:www.example.com on google, the 61 urls are displayed.

So, which one of these tools gives the real indexation report?

Thanks!

 

tedster




msg:4131712
 12:34 am on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

If the site: operator shows a URL from your site, then that URL is indexed.

But you can't expect the data from reports taken in different areas of Google to agree exactly - it won't. Asking which report is "real" is not a true question. There is no absolute "real" number - it's always churning. There is only what you see right now, and on this data center.

sleidia




msg:4131763
 2:19 am on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

Thanks tedster :)

That's exactly what I needed to know.

Have a nice day :)

gomer




msg:4131785
 3:27 am on May 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

Tedster, I would have agreed with your answer before but I'm seeing some very strange things with site: . As most would agree, site: gives odd results at the best of times but now I'm seeing something new (which I was thinking about starting a thread about).

Lately, site: shows many pages which do not have a cached link. From my experience and observation, site: used to always show pages which were cached. Now it seems to in some cases show pages which Google is aware of but does not necessarily have in it's index for one reason or another.

Just noticed somethind odd. I tried site: on Webmasterworld (and I hope there is not a problem with me posting that link here, example.com just won't do) and I'm seeing hardly any pages with a cached link.

[google.com...]

Why do most pages listed not have a cached link beside them? Yes, I do believe that WebmasterWorld is probably mostly cached but why are almost all pages not having a cached link? Am I missing something? I am seeing some sites with pages missing the cached links when using site: but doing this on WebmasterWorld, I'm having trouble seeing any pages with a cached link. Not sure what is up with that.

In summary, site: in my opinion is sometimes showing pages that are not cached by Google whereas one time it did.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved