| 7:42 pm on Sep 28, 2009 (gmt 0)|
|The types of articles he wants to write would be considered timeless... |
I myself feel that blogs do better with articles that have a temporal interest, whereas "timeless" articles do better in a site structured specifically around the subject matter. This would suggest keeping the articles as an extension of the current site.
| 7:48 pm on Sep 28, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Sounds like you are tying to create content that would be particualarly useful to anyone interested in buying your products. I would try to build that content into your curent site.
Create two way links from the articles to your category pages and from the category pages back to the articles. Only link pages that are closely related in topic, especially on the commerce side. So an article about how to find the right green widget would like to the green widgets page and so forth. Basically you will want to silo the content with the ecommerce side.
Other than the content management side of things, I do not think you would really benefit from using wordpress. If you want to create a blog that will be updated on a regular basis, then I would use wordpress.
| 8:40 pm on Sep 28, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Sub-domain = different site. Not a good idea if you want to attract more traffic to the primary site.
| 9:32 am on Sep 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I'm considering using a blogging application for a project I'm planning but am concerned about the navigation used in blogs and the effect on dupe issues.
Does the fact that a date based archive URL can lead to the same content or a page partially having the same content as a category URL cause problems with Google bot?
| 11:11 am on Sep 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
You can set up wordpress with the "page" structure rather than with the post structure. In that way it does not look like blog at all and if I remember correctly, you can build a hierarcy of pages.
With regards to where to put the wordpress, you can install wordpress in the subfolder of the main domain, e.g. www.example.com/howto/
The URLs do not have to have a date in it, you can pretty much decide on the format of the URL yourself, e.g. category name can be a part of URL structure followed by page name.
I think that the best is to install wordpress on some test domain and play with setting parameters to see if it will give you what you want.
| 12:05 pm on Sep 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
I understand changing the structure of the URL for subject rather then date, but wouldn't the fact that you are using Wordpress "tip off" the all-seeing Google that you are using a blog package and wouldn't that affect the longevity (not sure if this the right term to use) of the article? The client is kind of stuck on using Wordpress strictly from a management point of view. We are talking quite a few articles written by quite a few authors.
In other words... does Google treat blogs differently then pages? If so, exactly how?
I have several forums on other sites that were coded by me... no off the shelf or templated stuff. I have noticed through the years that when searching on Google, you get a hodge-podge of returns regardless of date. Same when you search for subjects and you get returns from Webmaster World. I can be searching for the best use of title tags or whether to use a meta description and up will pop a post from 2002. Not very relevant since the algo is constantly changing. In fact, it's frustrating when searching time-sensitive forums. Obviously, Google could care less about the date or whether a more recent article is more relevant. But when utilizing a blog, does the date matter? Is a more recent blog post weighted differently then a past blog post?
| 12:44 pm on Sep 29, 2009 (gmt 0)|
If the content is organised like an article database instead of a blog, then Google will index it via a category/subcategory/topic hierarchy rather than via a year/month/date hierarchy.
What you're alluding to is, regardless of site structure, Google letting the choice of CMS software (assuming that you can't completely hide the fact that it is WordPress in the first place) determine how they assess content.
That's not something I'd do if I was them. I would have thought (but I admit I don't know for sure) that the organisation would be sufficient to stop it being treated as information with an expiry date. I remember reading that links over time to a document can also convince Google that it is still relevant - as opposed to a big spike when it is new and then nothing after that.
| 9:32 pm on Sep 30, 2009 (gmt 0)|
|Do blogs have a tendency to fall out of the SERPs sooner because of the nature of blogs? |
Since the articles would be of interest today or a year from now, would going the Wordpress route be self defeating?
The way you would set up WordPress wouldn't be a blog as such. You would create WordPress Pages, not commentable WordPress Posts. The two are not the same. You would also remove any reference to publication dates within whatever Theme you use. And you might need to customise the WordPress sidebar where the menu is generated. With those provisos the package would do the job and would allow your client to publish content himself (given a bit of initial guidance).
That said, I would be inclined to advise your client that it would be preferable to just write the articles as an extension to his current site rather than adapt a fully-featured blogging platform to remove its features (and it also needs regular upgrades). I like WordPress, but one of its features is to allow comments, which your client doesn't require.