homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

redirects, hidden text & meta refresh = spam no longer?

10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3969775 posted 2:04 pm on Aug 11, 2009 (gmt 0)

In my day redirects, hidden text & meta refresh = spam is this not the case anymore? yahoo search, bing and Google all giving this site a first page listing plus #1 in the new Google for a VERY high traffic generic keyword. The site is the corporate site of one of the biggest companies in the UK.

Anyone have any thoughts



5+ Year Member

Msg#: 3969775 posted 5:47 pm on Aug 11, 2009 (gmt 0)

I'm also worried about performance regarding this issue, but in a "legit way". I think it's a gray area. We're having some problems with some sites that require some pretty scary redirects.... but there's some cases where larger complex sites will change content mechanically and force some pretty weird code. If it's a top performer, then there's caching engines as well that may force engineers to place brutal redirects.

the hidden text, well now... don't be shy and do tell us the site.


WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3969775 posted 10:08 pm on Aug 11, 2009 (gmt 0)

If hidden text cannot be made visible on screen by some user action, that's still considered spam.

One challenge Google faces is that such true hidden text is very hard to detect algorithmically in these days of CSS, DHTML, AJAX, etc. So Google relies on their army of human reviewers quite heavily in detecting true hidden text.

Another challenge comes with websites for major companies - the kind of website that searchers might 100% expect to find in the search results for a given word - sometimes even a generic word. I don't mean that Google doesn't penalize the big boys on occasion - but when they do, the company can get restored quite quickly after a fix. And sometimes they do seem to "let it slide", especially when the ranking is not really influenced by the hidden text [that's my guess].

When it comes to redirects and meta-refresh, Google does not make black and white judgements. They also consider the intent - whether the redirect or refresh is trying to be deceptive or not. They are mostly focused on what they call "sneaky javascript redirects". Their current Guidelines page [google.com] has some examples:

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved