homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.243.13.30
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Death of the supplemental index (/*) site: operator?
chal00d




msg:3937961
 3:11 am on Jun 22, 2009 (gmt 0)

Just wanted to find out if folks are still using the site: operator extension that allegedly reveals the *true* number of pages indexed - e.g. does not count pages in the supplemental index.

So, in theory at least, the following operator will exclude all the pages of a site in Google's supplemental index: site:www.example.com/* (note the "/*" trailing the url).

I've seen some pretty steep drops recently for a couple of sites, while the regular "site:" operator has returned stable results. Wondering if its something I should be concerned with and interested to hears others opinions on this.

Is this advanced operator still supported/working? anyone still using it as part of their SEO metrics/reporting?

 

tedster




msg:3937968
 3:28 am on Jun 22, 2009 (gmt 0)

One thing I've noticed along this line - you know the way the regular site: operator results will tell you "about 1,200 pages" - but then you click through and only get about 400? The actual clickthrough number is pretty darned close to the /* number.

Still, I'm not sure what practical use this kind of analysis has these days. For starters, the old supplemental is not what it used to be - not at all.

What we do know is that not every indexed url gets total attention from Google. Only some urls are given the full treatment, and others are returned rarely in search results, whatever kind of database partition (probably many partitions) they are kept in. For example, some apparently indexed urls are not returned for searches on exact text strings found on the page.

As a sign of overall domain health, I prefer noticing which urls Google chooses to export to AOL Search. That number tends to be even lower than the /* hack returns, but it is a pretty clear signal about which urls in a domain are getting the full monty.

steveb




msg:3938012
 6:08 am on Jun 22, 2009 (gmt 0)

Instead of http://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.example.com+-site:www.example.com/*

Try http://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.example.com/dir1/+-site:www.example.com/*

Do the search via each individual directory of your domain.

[edited by: Robert_Charlton at 8:49 am (utc) on June 22, 2009]
[edit reason] delinked urls [/edit]

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved