homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.231.221
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe to WebmasterWorld
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Outbound links better without script?
silverbytes




msg:3749963
 10:53 pm on Sep 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

I have several links to other websites (gizmo directory linking to gizmo services) but in order to count clicks I link to an internal php script

example: ../clicks_counter.php?http://www.example.com

I'm wondering if am I missing the benefit to have those linked directly, since they are so close related to site theme.

Would you personally remove the link to click counter in order to gain some google love related to linked sites?

[edited by: Robert_Charlton at 12:24 am (utc) on Sep. 23, 2008]
[edit reason] removed specifics [/edit]

 

tedster




msg:3750026
 12:53 am on Sep 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

It depends on how many links there are and how well you police them for turning into a bad neighborhood.

If you remove the script you are definitely passing PageRank. So Google will scrutinze them a lot more for evidence of link selling.

That's the downside, or at least one of them. One upside may be that Google uses those links to better understand your page's relevance.

silverbytes




msg:3750674
 7:08 pm on Sep 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

Doesn't Google actually understand my page's relevance even when I use a click counter script?

Lord Majestic




msg:3750676
 7:11 pm on Sep 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

These days it might be wiser to count clicks using JavaScript rather than redirect scripts - if you have got a lot of such outlinks that get redirected, then it would certainly fit link pattern of directory and you might not want that to happen.

incrediBILL




msg:3750815
 10:05 pm on Sep 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

I know someone that removed their click counters and suddenly the site took a nasty penalty.

I would suspect that a sudden surge in raw links signals a filter to engage.

restless




msg:3750851
 11:06 pm on Sep 23, 2008 (gmt 0)

using the link: operator I have seen evidence that Google counts these redirects as backlinks, and why shouldn't they? if that is the page where the user is ending up then it's still the same as a normal link.

silverbytes




msg:3751359
 5:07 pm on Sep 24, 2008 (gmt 0)

Seems like all click countered links are bad because you look like a directory and straight links passes page rank what means less pr for your internal pages and having an eye on how good are linked sites.

Lord Majestic




msg:3751362
 5:10 pm on Sep 24, 2008 (gmt 0)

using the link: operator I have seen evidence that Google counts these redirects as backlinks

Google's behaviour when it comes to backlinks and redirects is very interesting - they would show backlinks to a URL A that redirects to URL B as backlinks for link: URL B command. This certainly does not happen for all redirects but it does happen. In theory this should channel all PR value of URL A backlinks to be assigned to URL B.

tedster




msg:3751391
 5:37 pm on Sep 24, 2008 (gmt 0)

Google will even show backlinks that have a rel="nofollow" attribute. The report is more for webmaster information than a direct statement that "these links are helping your rankings."

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved