tedster
msg:3733705 | 5:49 pm on Aug 28, 2008 (gmt 0) |
It sounds like a ranking problem to me. For one thing, Google recommends no more than 100 total links on a page. And if a page has nothing but links, it starts to match one type of spammer profile. I suggest you give your visitors some content to read on the Home Page.
|
Funtick
msg:3733798 | 7:35 pm on Aug 28, 2008 (gmt 0) |
Nothing wrong with 200 links (not more!); after that you will get warnings in WMTools (not more!) - not a penalty. "Clickable" is content too. You don't really need "sitemap"-type pages in SERPs. But (for instance) list of clickable titles of books in a specific subject is very "content-rich" for human eyes and for Google.
|
BenjArriola
msg:3733824 | 8:07 pm on Aug 28, 2008 (gmt 0) |
I have seen many CSS Galleries with homepages that are full of links with no significant amount of content and yet still have high PR and rank well.
|
ante99
msg:3734090 | 4:21 am on Aug 29, 2008 (gmt 0) |
Thank you for your answers, but still different opinions.
Anyone with more pracitcal experience...
1. Would it be better if I did have unlinked content in the body
2. Or - does it not matter at all Thank´s in advance
|
Marcia
msg:3734092 | 4:45 am on Aug 29, 2008 (gmt 0) |
And this is supposed to enrich the experience of your users in what way?
|
piatkow
msg:3734223 | 10:25 am on Aug 29, 2008 (gmt 0) |
I had the "clickable title" problem on an information page which screwed the SERPS. I fixed it by taking the links off the titles and put a button beside each instead. I had seen other information sites with the same format which ranked well but G clearly didn't like it when I did it.
|
|
