homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.141.230
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe and Support WebmasterWorld
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Effect of Wikipedia Links to Rankings
Good, Bad, or Indifferent?
HRoth




msg:3520870
 1:15 pm on Dec 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

I wasn't sure where to ask this. I searched but didn't see any definite info one way or the other about whether links from Wikipedia have a good, bad, or indifferent effect on ranking. I ask because four of my top ten links are from Wikipedia pages. These point to pages where I do sell a product but where I have a lot of information about it, and that's why someone put the link. Other than bringing visitors, does this affect ranking for those pages? Does it affect the ranking of the site as a whole?

 

tedster




msg:3521145
 7:49 pm on Dec 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

Wikipedia now uses the rel="nofollow" attribute on external links, so there's no direct link juice flowing to you. That said, so many people read Wikipedia that it can have a strong secondary effect of helping you to acquire links from other sites who discovered you first on aWkikpeida link.

HRoth




msg:3521602
 12:45 pm on Dec 6, 2007 (gmt 0)

Okay, thanks.

potentialgeek




msg:3521620
 1:41 pm on Dec 6, 2007 (gmt 0)

Yeah, junk sites that expect to get link juice from linking to bigger (legit) sites, lift the links from first directories they find, which are often Wiki's external footer links.

p/g

BillyS




msg:3521623
 1:52 pm on Dec 6, 2007 (gmt 0)

The biggest benefit is the secondary traffic coming from Wiki itself.

nuevojefe




msg:3523968
 7:37 am on Dec 10, 2007 (gmt 0)

Do a controlled test. There's always the possibility that a link, even if nofollowed, could appease another part of the algorithm besides pagerank (trustrank for example). That and to see how it affects rankings for other engines.

Johan007




msg:3524010
 9:33 am on Dec 10, 2007 (gmt 0)

I presume nofollow carries no weight on any algorithm in Google otherwise the attribute will have no credibility.

HRoth




msg:3524072
 12:37 pm on Dec 10, 2007 (gmt 0)

"Yeah, junk sites that expect to get link juice from linking to bigger (legit) sites, lift the links from first directories they find, which are often Wiki's external footer links."

I don't understand the second part of the sentence.

I do very much appreciate the traffic. I was just worried that in some way Google might take away ranking from a business mentioned in Wikipedia, thinking that it must be spamming.

devil_dog




msg:3525158
 4:39 pm on Dec 11, 2007 (gmt 0)

I do very much appreciate the traffic. I was just worried that in some way Google might take away ranking from a business mentioned in Wikipedia, thinking that it must be spamming.

I dont think so... AFAIK thats wikipedia's lookout. in my opinion googlebot doesnt care weather a user put your link... or a spambot... or wikipedia themselves...

Anything on my site.. spam or not.. is my sole responsibility. similarly if i spam this forum with my own link, google wont penalize me in fact it would only boost my rankings... now if my site is spamy then webmasterworld will loose some of its credibility in google's eyes...

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved