homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.19.33.5
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe and Support WebmasterWorld
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Google site: command - does this approach remove all Supplementals?
metaman01




msg:3385967
 10:54 am on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

When I search with the site command for example

site:www.example.com/

I get different results than for

site:www.example.com/*

It looks to me that all the supplemental results are gone when you search with the star sign at the end. Could someone verify that?

 

tedster




msg:3386370
 8:09 pm on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

Looks like it does -- no supplementals for me and the total number of pages goes down, too. But the site: command has been so flakey that I wonder what these many hack-type site: queries I read about actually return.

Still, thanks for the tip. It's an interesting new toy to play with.

g1smd




msg:3386451
 11:20 pm on Jul 4, 2007 (gmt 0)

I like that tip. It seems to do what you say, at least for the moment.

There may be other, as yet un-noticed, side effects though.

tedster




msg:3386520
 2:00 am on Jul 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

I apologize for my poor manners - this deserves a very hearty.....

Welcome to the forum metaman01!

That was an excellent first post.

subhendu




msg:3386621
 4:30 am on Jul 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

site:www.sitename.com *** -sa

Only supplemental results.

g1smd




msg:3387213
 8:09 pm on Jul 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

So it does!

netchicken1




msg:3387228
 8:21 pm on Jul 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

does it?

It does give different pages, but there is no indicaton on my site that they are sup pages.

tedster




msg:3387234
 8:27 pm on Jul 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

One challenge that I have with these undocumented operator queries is this:

The supplementals-only query above gives me urls that also show in the regular search results without a supplemental tag. They even have the same cache date in both incarnations. In fact, some other site: operator queries also show the same url/cache date without the supplemental tag.

So what action can I sanely take on this basis? My concern is that these queries are tricking the site: operator into a worse-than-usual level of accuracy by asking them to perform outside the way they were designed.

reseller




msg:3393471
 9:37 am on Jul 13, 2007 (gmt 0)

I don't know whether this has been mentioned before.

The following site: operator "version" shows results without supplementals

site:www.example.*

(*) instead of tld code

new_seo




msg:3393541
 11:27 am on Jul 13, 2007 (gmt 0)

Thanks metaman01,this is really helpful. :)

g1smd




msg:3394117
 7:39 pm on Jul 13, 2007 (gmt 0)

Some URLs will always show up as Supplemental for some search queries and as normal for others.

This is completely normal. The Supplemental results are usually for words from an earlier version of the page.

See [webmasterworld.com...] and related threads.

tabish




msg:3394402
 6:28 am on Jul 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

When i use site:mysitename.com/ I get 140000 results and when I use site:mysitename.com/* i get only 600 results.

What does that mean? is there anything wrong with my site?

metaman01




msg:3403998
 12:18 pm on Jul 25, 2007 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the big welcome tedster. I've been lurking this forum for a while and now it feels great to be out of the closet :-)

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved