| 6:34 pm on Jun 1, 2007 (gmt 0)|
| 6:57 pm on Jun 1, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I also noticed this.. What is the point of the inlink section if it never updates?
| 8:49 pm on Jun 1, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I do have the same problem I am going to flag this massage my Page analysis and web site statistics never changed even after I have added several pages and my inbount links has doubled?!
| 9:31 pm on Jun 1, 2007 (gmt 0)|
It's FREE, what do you expect?
| 4:00 am on Jun 1, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Google is not updating my web site information, except for the site map links and the spider rate visit, non of the links, and Page analysis has been updated though I did several changes to the site and added several pages. Do you know if I need to do anything to let google reread the whole site?
[edited by: tedster at 5:40 pm (utc) on Feb. 19, 2008]
[edit reason] moved from another location [/edit]
| 10:09 am on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I've had an update this morning. A different backlink total for the first time in maybe 3-4 months.
And... my backlink total has fallen! God dammit!
| 7:29 pm on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
> I've had an update this morning.
Same for me as it seems.
> And... my backlink total has fallen! God dammit!
If you take a closer look, it seems as if in particular a number of scraper directories have been wiped out, which is not that negative at all, but obviously a step towards more quality.
I assume there may be a connection with that new "report paid links" tool in WC (ist that really the abbreviation for webmaser central?;), which we discussed here [webmasterworld.com].
[edited by: Oliver_Henniges at 7:33 pm (utc) on June 15, 2007]
| 8:41 pm on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
|I assume there may be a connection with that new "report paid links" tool in WC |
Oliver - You think they are not showing you links that they believe are paid? That would certainly be interesting, but is way more feedback than I would expect them to give. Makes it to easy for link purchasers to determine which are no longer good links...
| 8:55 pm on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Probably low on the priorities list of things to do at Google..
Whomever (individual/team) is managing this is probably on other projects for now..
Give it some time...it's a good resource and should eventually have some work done on it again...
| 10:43 pm on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
trakkerguy, I always thought I was paranoid, but now I found my master. I bow my head in modesty...
| 11:27 pm on Jun 17, 2007 (gmt 0)|
looks like they finally updated the links today.
| 9:04 pm on Jun 19, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Maybe this can be explained by Vanessa Fox's departure from Google. [vanessafoxnude.com...] (She's leaving because the webmaster tools aren't what they should be ... or the webmaster tools aren't what they should be because the product manager was checked out).
| 5:00 pm on Jun 20, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Mine finally updated so hopefully yours did as well. My ranks have not moved significantly since Late March, the same time as the previous WMT update. J
| 5:31 pm on Jun 20, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I look after about 60 sites and use this tool. I'm fairly certain that the rankings and click data (like the link: query) are a random sampling.
The 20 results are definitely NOT in order of demand (i.e. most popular phrase would be number 1). I have a fair few sites that are in the top 100 for some one word super-terms but they never show up.
In fact whilst I am grateful for it because it's free I would far rather pay for a complete tool!