Msg#: 3341363 posted 5:59 pm on May 18, 2007 (gmt 0)
Thanks for the replies. I've noticed some sites ranking high in both regional Google sites and when I check the host I find them to be located in the US. I can't begin to understand how they manage to score high in the results being a US company.
Msg#: 3341363 posted 6:18 pm on May 18, 2007 (gmt 0)
For generic terms there seems to be a "core" of allinanchor results that feature on all Gs, just how well they feature depends on local competition, and due to size/history most of these sites are from the US...
Msg#: 3341363 posted 12:26 pm on May 19, 2007 (gmt 0)
*..or is it something else? *
On that "web widget" search on G.co.uk I noticed some of the UK results were nowhere in the allinanchor for that term but were tops for "website widget", "web widgeting" terms.
It struck me that if G wants to localise while still keeping their qualitative parameters rather than simply drilling down on one search term to find UK sites they could include the top results for closely related terms.
Msg#: 3341363 posted 12:44 pm on May 19, 2007 (gmt 0)
G is localasing. As simple as that. More targeted, better for the users on the most part.
If it works.
There's a discussion over here on key aspects of localisation filters that appear not to be clearly understood and potentially not working properly. It's a topic for clarification by G [ IMO ], but I've only heard of anecdotal inputs from G to clarify - nothing direct.