homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.205.160.82
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe to WebmasterWorld
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
What exactly is a natural link?
irr1449




msg:3295616
 6:27 pm on Mar 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

I've seen a lot of talk about acquiring links with great significant given to whether or not the links are natural as opposed to purchased, spammed, traded or otherwise "un-natural". What exactly is a natural link? Is it a link on a relevant page? Is it a link in the body of the main content? I don't see any programmatic way that google can distinguish between a natural link and a link that is suspect.

Obviously links that are part of link farms and spam pages can easily be identified, but what about text link ads? I've looked at the HTML on these pages and there are no identifying marks that make these links any different than any other link. The links can be located anywhere, they match the scheme of the site they are on, and most of the time look very "natural"

I think its in google's best interest to tell everyone that paid links are not going to count towards your ranking, but I don't see any possible way google can remove them from the equation unless they remove link weight all together. If they do ever figure out a way to remove them, link sellers will just find a way to make them appear "natural" so it's really just a losing battle.

[edited by: tedster at 7:38 pm (utc) on Mar. 28, 2007]
[edit reason] fix charset trouble [/edit]

 

BigDave




msg:3295642
 6:58 pm on Mar 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

I don't see any programmatic way that google can distinguish between a natural link and a link that is suspect.

Then you would not be a very good search engine programmer.

First off, don't think of it as a binary "natural" vs. "unnatural", think of it as a continuous scale.

The HTML isn't the only place to look when it comes to this issue, in fact it is one of the worst places to look. A webgraph of the incoming and outgoing links is where you would start.

Where on the page is the link? It is pretty easy to pro grammatically recognize a a navigation sidebar or a footer.

How is the linking done? If all your links are to the home page with the same anchor text, and it is not the name of your site, but stuffed with keywords, it isn't hard to see how those might get discounted.

Are the links to your site on a site that is full of other suspicious links?

Are ALL your links reciprocal or three-way? Some reciprocal linking is natural, and occurs without being traded. But if all your links are reciprocal with other sites where all their links are reciprocal, things start to look bad.

All that was off the top of my head. Google has a lot of very smart people working on this full-time. You can still trick them, but don't assume that it is easy, or that it will keep working long-term.

tedster




msg:3295664
 7:25 pm on Mar 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

We had a good discussion about this a little while back. In fact, it's now part of our "Hot Topics" section, and it's also in the forum Library.

Natural vs. Un-natural - in SEO and the Google Algorithm [webmasterworld.com]

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved