mikeD
msg:3274320 | 7:07 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0) |
depends on the quality of the directory links I would venture. anyone else got some advice?
|
BigDave
msg:3274324 | 7:09 pm on Mar 7, 2007 (gmt 0) |
Supplemental pages rank just fine for the long tail, and that is really all that new sites with only a few links should rank for anyway.
|
freelistfool
msg:3274777 | 2:22 am on Mar 8, 2007 (gmt 0) |
New sites usually go supplemental due to no incoming links and low pagerank on the internal pages. Just keep building your content and work on getting links. If you do a little work your pages will start coming out of the supplemental index.
|
Sweet Cognac
msg:3274853 | 4:19 am on Mar 8, 2007 (gmt 0) |
Yes, I have a new site that went supplemental. It still gets found though. It never used to be like that for new sites. This is something that just recently started. The only thing that I have ever had supplemental was pages that 404'd. It used to be that new sites would rank well right off, and collect links while on top, then drop to page 3 or 4. Then slowly work their way back up.
|
|
