homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.255.168
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
'Poor' Site Ranks High for Competitve Term
Why?
rioroccoroma

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 7:17 pm on Nov 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

I am working on a site that will have to compete in a competitive area online, so I am understandably nervous about how I am going to fare. Anyway - to get going I typed in some of the most popular phrases for my website into Google today and noticed that a site that should not be on top, (at least as far as I can work out), is still occupying position 1 on Google.

The site has :
1) barely any content
2) consists of only 6 pages
3) 5 of them have hardly any text
4) Has an Alexa rating (for what it is worth) of 4,300,0005)
5) According to Yahoo Site Explorer has 7 incoming links (not counting links from within its own domain)
6) Counting its own internal links, it has a further 15 incoming links
7) All incoming links (as listed by Yahho) are from sites with a PR of 0
8) Google's site: query lists 30 incoming links, but they are all internal, it lists no sites linking in at all.
9) Home page has PR of 1/10
10) Google does not have a cached snapshot of the page

Sites that rank lower than the one described above are rich, large, fully featured, high content sites simply loaded with information.

It makes the job of trying to compete really difficult if you see a site that seems so rubbish, being ranked at position 1.

What have I missed?

 

ronburk

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 7:20 pm on Nov 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

What have I missed?

The percentage of people who click on their SERP and do not return to Google to search elsewhere.

texasville

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 10:48 pm on Nov 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

never can tell. it might have been around since 1996. sometimes that seems to carry a lot of weight.

vite_rts

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 11:01 pm on Nov 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

That age factor seems very strong actually

rioroccoroma

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 11:57 pm on Nov 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

Thanks. I have looked and the domain appears to be 2 years old. Is that old?

SEOPTI

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 2:32 am on Nov 16, 2006 (gmt 0)

9) Those sites for sure don't have PR 1, you can't see their real time PR!

theBear

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 2:38 am on Nov 16, 2006 (gmt 0)

"10) Google does not have a cached snapshot of the page"

As in no cache link at all?

If so maybe that site fed the bot special bot kibble ;-).

rioroccoroma

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 5:14 pm on Nov 16, 2006 (gmt 0)

SEOPTI : 9) Those sites for sure don't have PR 1, you can't see their real time PR!

OK - it is not real time but it was the best I could do!

theBear : I wondered if someone had helped the site get to where it is using 'special techniques'. How could I find out? Or should I not care, just shrug my shoulders and get on with my work?

dangerman

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3157654 posted 5:44 pm on Nov 16, 2006 (gmt 0)

Often, 'special techniques' produce a temporary rise in the rankings. So if the high ranking is gone in a month or earlier, that will be the likely reason.

Personally, I wouldn't worry about it and get on with building more quality pages around the subject area described by the key term.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved