homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.145.191.14
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

This 58 message thread spans 2 pages: 58 ( [1] 2 > >     
Meeting with a Google engineer
Hercules2

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 3:45 pm on Sep 26, 2006 (gmt 0)

I have a meeting with a Google Engineer tomorrow about Organic(!) Search. I have exactly one hour!

What would you ask him? I have some ok questions but i think i will forget something...
I'm gonna post the usable answers here of course!

 

trinorthlighting

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 11:37 pm on Sep 26, 2006 (gmt 0)

Ask them what they are doing about subdomain spam that keeps coming back into the index.

WolfLover

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 11:48 pm on Sep 26, 2006 (gmt 0)

If possible, please ask this person about the whole supplemental pages problem and what exactly is it that Google expects from us so that we can change our sites if need be.

Thanks!

Amarula

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 11:49 pm on Sep 26, 2006 (gmt 0)

Please ask when are they going to restore innocent sites which lost their rankings in the past few months

g1smd

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 11:53 pm on Sep 26, 2006 (gmt 0)

>> Ask this person about the whole supplemental pages problem and what exactly is it that Google expects from us so that we can change our sites if need be. <<

I think that one has been done to death, both here and at Matt Cutts blog already.

Redirects, and canonicalisation is all it is.

Whitey

WebmasterWorld Senior Member whitey us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:09 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

For sites that have been restored and crawled, after fixing their sites for supplementals problems, what is the procedure and time for restoring the results fully to the SERP's?

Does the re introduction of "lots of new pages"* after the fix trigger a "flag" that then inhibits proper results from appearing as one would normally expect?

*[ Matt has said sites with more than 5000 pages launched per week will be flagged .. refer to his video ]

Some clarification on the sandboxing procedures and how to get out of the sandbox would be appreciated per [webmasterworld.com...]

The reason i ask is that this has occurred with us. We did the fixes in in July/Aug but we seem to have some "filter" still on our results after around 8 weeks. Should we be worried or just letting things work themselves through?

[edited by: Whitey at 12:16 am (utc) on Sep. 27, 2006]

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:12 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

g1smd,

Your are 100% right, but once your site is affected, it's very hard to crawl out the supplemental results.

Question should be if our site is in supplemental results due to redirect, canonicalisation, ur rewritting, duplicate contents etc. and has been fixed by webmaster (page has been 301 redirected etc.) how do we get those pages out of supplemental results?

Once a page is marked supplemental, Google hardly looks at those pages again and supplemental pages hardly ever get indexed again, which has a huge impact on rankings.

pageoneresults

WebmasterWorld Senior Member pageoneresults us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:17 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

What would you ask him?

How can I consistently get the number one position for "all" of my targeted keyword phrases? :)

Once a page is marked supplemental, Google hardly looks at those pages again and supplemental pages hardly ever get indexed again, which has a huge impact on rankings.

There are ways to influence Google's crawling pattern to get those Supplementals out of there. But, if you did not address the problem that put them there to begin with, you'd be chasing your tail. ;)

g1smd

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:19 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Supplemental Results that represent URLs that now issue a 301, or a 404, stay visible in the index for one year after they start doing that. At that point they no longer count as Duplicate Content.

Only URLs that return "200 OK" and are tagged as Supplemental need to be investigated for problems with the site. Those problems are usually multiple URLs for the same content. See the longer thread [webmasterworld.com]

Marcia

WebmasterWorld Senior Member marcia us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:21 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

There are some pages in the cache for Supplemental pages that are a serious security risk for the site in question.

It would be very BAD to have the actual page removed from the index, but there should be a way to remove the cache if the page is Supplemental and that cache will just sit out there forever waiting for an exploit to happen.

There have been enough server exploits and sites getting hacked lately without Google providing them with a roadmap to help them out. And they ARE doing just that with some caches of pages sitting out there that give holes for script kiddies to tap into.

[edited by: Marcia at 12:25 am (utc) on Sep. 27, 2006]

texasville

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:23 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

I don't believe that canonicalization and redirects are the only reason for supplemental results. Most of my site went supplemental long AFTER I did a 301. Some 10 months later.

Ask this engineer if pages can be pushed into supplemental because of lack of inbound links. I'm not talking about from the same base href but outside inbound links. I am highly suspicious that there has been a trend since Big Daddy to send pages into the supplemental if they have none. If so, can they ever be restored to the regular index.

Marcia

WebmasterWorld Senior Member marcia us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:28 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

I don't believe that canonicalization and redirects are the only reason for supplemental results. Most of my site went supplemental long AFTER I did a 301. Some 10 months later.

Ask this engineer if pages can be pushed into supplemental because of lack of inbound links. I'm not talking about from the same base href but outside inbound links. I am highly suspicious that there has been a trend since Big Daddy to send pages into the supplemental if they have none. If so, can they ever be restored to the regular index.


You hit a nerve wit that one, which warrants some further discussion, but don't want to take this off course. I flagged the thread to follow up on this very thing.

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:29 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

"But, if you did not address the problem that put them there to begin with, you'd be chasing your tail. ;) "

My question is if the problem has been addressed, how do you get Google to put these pages back into thier regular index?

g1smd

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:33 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

I have seen this many times:

A site is indexed with both non-www and www URLs showing up (for a site where you prefer www to be listed). Some non-www URLs are shown as normal results, and so are some www URLs too. Some URLs of both types already show as Supplemental or as URL-only too.

One day you decide to install the redirect to www, and more www pages become indexed in the next few weeks. Once several months have elapsed after the redirect was put in place you see that many of those now redirected non-www URLs suddenly reappear in the SERPs as Supplemental Results.

I have seen that many times. They stick around for a year, and then vanish.

If that is what you have then no need to worry.

If the URLs that you redirect to are Supplemental than you have more issues to sort out: could be more of the same, or some other problem.

I have seen some sites dip into Supplemental due to a lack of inbound links to the site as a whole, and Matt Cutts confirmed that does happen - several months ago.

What you also need to be aware of, is throwing away your internal PR by inefficient internal linking.

Every page should link back to your root index page but don't throw all of your PageRank at /index.html because Google usually prefers to list www.domain.com/ instead; so link to that one as http://www.domain.com/ every time.

Use breadcrumb navigation to spread PR around the site, too, if you can.

[edited by: g1smd at 12:39 am (utc) on Sep. 27, 2006]

Marcia

WebmasterWorld Senior Member marcia us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:34 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

>> Ask this person about the whole supplemental pages problem and what exactly is it that Google expects from us so that we can change our sites if need be. <<

I think that one has been done to death, both here and at Matt Cutts blog already.

Redirects, and canonicalisation is all it is.


Sorry, but I beg to differ with that one. That isn't all it is; it just isn't all that simple and dry cut.

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:40 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

"If the URLs that you redirect to are Supplemental than you have more issues to sort out: could be more of the same, or some other problem."

Let's assume two url's went into supplemental due to duplicate contents, we decide to keep one and 301 redirect the other url.

How do we get the one we decide to keep out of supplemental? Do we just wait for it to happen?

They hardly ever cache supplemental pages, for that reason we could probably end up waiting forever..

SuddenlySara



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:43 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Don't forget about subdomain spam as said already by trinorth...;-)

Today is really crazy for me looking at google serps. Many old outdated sites that are no longer and many, many subdomains hinting at best on keyword relevance in many sectors that I'm watching.

There must be many things brewing at the complex right now. Really curious when some new serious updates will happen without outdated no-longer existing urls and?

WolfLover

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:52 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

"But, if you did not address the problem that put them there to begin with, you'd be chasing your tail. "
My question is if the problem has been addressed, how do you get Google to put these pages back into thier regular index?

I'm with you F_Rose! Please, if you say there are ways to get your site our of supplemental, please let us know. I'm going through my site now trying to figure out what is wrong. I'm cleaning up the code and site, but I really do not see anything that is wrong, unless it is the duplicate content filter, due to I sell so many products that are similar.

I'd be more than happy to clean up and fix my site if I only had a clue as to what is suddenly wrong with it. I am doing the 301 redirect now but I never knew about this being an issue until now. Could that one thing be what put most of my pages in supplemental?

Please do give us the steps to get our pages out of supplemental. It would really be appreciated by many of us.

To the OP. Please do ask the engineer if something as simple as the www versus NON-www issue could put most of your pages in supplemental. If not, then what are the major triggers that may have and how do you get out?

Thank you in advance!

Pirates



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:54 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Perhaps you could ask why google has appeared to go backwords and value keyword in domain name more valuable than content and if this is a response to msn's very poor engine.

panicbutton

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:59 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Ask him where he gets his hair cut...

Optimus

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 8:31 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

I also want to know why google has appeared to go backwards and value keyword in domain name more important than content. Also why the penalty on domains with a hyphen when the domain name does NOT have any keywords in it.

mr_lumpy

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 9:32 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Hello,

Please ask if the meta tag "noarchive", applied to every page in a site, causes any degradation in ranking at all.

I have a lot of good reasons (legal among others) for not wanting cached versions of my pages - but I keep hearing the siren song of increased rankings if I remove "noarchive".

I would love to know, once and for all, if there is ANY effect in having that tag on the ranking.

Thank-you.

Hercules2

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 9:51 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Hi everyone,

I just had my meeting with the engineer. It was pretty cool. He had tips for getting reindexed: Fix everything and start using google sitemaps. Sites that used a lot of spam or are from known spammers will not be reindexed.

About the sandbox... its related to links, older domains have benefit from having more links.

The main goal should be getting links with good link descryption from relevant sites. (so what else is new...)

And no he didn't know who Google Guy was...

itloc

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 10:19 am on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Hercules2

Ask him what kind of methods they do use to build their clusters. I would be grateful.. ;-)))

itloc

jetteroheller

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jetteroheller us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:01 pm on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

I just had my meeting with the engineer. It was pretty cool. He had tips for getting reindexed: Fix everything and start using google sitemaps. Sites that used a lot of spam or are from known spammers will not be reindexed.

I am indexed, but since June 27th with a filter penalty reducing Google traffic by 85%

I tried to fix everything, I heared in this forum.

Sometimes, I feel like a witch doctor performing rain dances.

Hercules2

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:23 pm on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

shooting from the hip... on your not ranking well.
1. no duplicate content on your site/ did nobody steal your copy? you can look at this with "copyscape"

2. no strange javascripts with links build in on your site

3. no "nofolow" tags on your site.

4. don't use your keyword too many times on a url

[edited by: tedster at 2:14 pm (utc) on Sep. 27, 2006]

SEOPTI

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 12:34 pm on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

Please ask them why expiring domains still avoid the sandbox effect.

Phil_Payne

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 1:02 pm on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

"noarchive" tags _DO_ affect rankings.

I have a safety-critical page that I do not want cached anywhere - historically #1 on all engines for its highly obscure keywords.

I added nocache tags about three months ago, and it vanished from Google's SERPs just like that. None of the other search engines were affected. I took the nocache off and it's back where it should be.

A highly unsatisfactory situation, but there it is.

Frederic1

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 1:25 pm on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

very interesting Phil_Payne!

Hercules2

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3097682 posted 1:27 pm on Sep 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

No follow tag is the same story

This 58 message thread spans 2 pages: 58 ( [1] 2 > >
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved