homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.16.130.188
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Site Move: 301 and 410 combination?
What would keep Google happiest?
ProTalker




msg:3088593
 12:30 pm on Sep 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

I'm closing Site B and incorporating a large number of pages into Site A. Whilst I assume the correct procedure is to replace the transferred pages with a 301 redirect to the new page on Site A, and to replace the dead pages with a 410, I'm aware that what seems to be the correct procedure is not always the one which Google likes best. Am I safe to go this way, or does anyone have any better ideas? For example, should I not use a 410 for the dead pages, but use a 301 to a NOINDEXed page explaining to readers what's gone on?

 

charlier




msg:3091912
 5:22 pm on Sep 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

I was wondering about this as well, anyone have any ideas?

g1smd




msg:3092041
 7:21 pm on Sep 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

Stuff that you moved: 301

Stuff that is gone: 404 or 410.

Correct.

For the 404 or 410 page, serve a custom page that contains some basic site navigation to get the user on their way to the correct part of the new site.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved