homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

Interlink between my sites different topics in same general category

 3:39 pm on Sep 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

For years I have resisted interlink between my sites each which have a different topic under the same general category.

For example, one site sells basketball shirts, another sells baseball shirts, another sells football shirts.

Each site only mentions the word of its respective sport.
Yet each site uses the same general layout, coding, and very similar text other than the different sports words.

If I had it to do over again 7 years ago I would have just made 1 site. But it's too late for that...

2 questions:

1) Is it ok for me to put a left menu bar link on each site that links to the other sites using "basketball shirts" & "baseball shirts" in the link text on the football site, and visa versa for the other sites?

2) Is it okay to create a page that says "Sports shirts" on each site that links to the others using the link text mentioned above (but in paragraphs rather than left menu bar) or will that page have too much of the same text since each site will now have a page that says "sports shirts"?

Should I just pick the best site to go with option 2 on, assuming it's even okay to do option 1?

Thanks so much for your opinion.



 4:45 pm on Sep 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

If/when linking from one site to the other should the link be in a manner that would not pass PR so as to avoid any possible interlinking penalty?

For example, using rel no follow?

Or am I living in the dark ages thinking interlinking would be penalized? After all, it would be better for site visitors.

I suppose the left bar links could even be graphical in nature, for example, so as to avoid using the word "basketball" on the "football" site which is one of the things that could potentially produce a dup penalty.

Does this make sense?



 8:13 pm on Sep 6, 2006 (gmt 0)


I am a web developer and on one of my pages on our company site, I have many examples of sites that I host. All of these examples have links to their home. Some of these rank relativley high in the SERPS. Some of these sites have "devloped by blah company" with a link going back to our company site. I have never had any problems doing this. But you would think by some of the posts here that interlinking, especially within the same C class is a big no no. Well. I have never really had a problem with it. However... and this is a big however... non of these sites interlink with each other. I don't think I want to try something like that. All the sites are radically different from e-commerce to non-profits. There really is no reason to interlink them just for GPR.

Not sure if this helps or not. If you were interlinking your sites based solely on the convenience of your users, then I think that should play a dominant role in your decision to do so.

Just my opinion.


 5:27 am on Sep 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Thanks webdude... Yes it's definitely starting to become a matter of convenience...


 7:00 am on Sep 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

But you would think by some of the posts here that interlinking, especially within the same C class is a big no no.

Advice can come from a variety of sources who are trying to do a variety of things. Take this theoretcial situation. Someone may be working with a group of "shadow networks" -- say 10 groups with 100 to 300 relatively disposable domains in each -- and they are hoping to stay off Google's radar for a couple of months or so with some loosely designed interlinking. Getting too many domains banned too fast might be a pain the neck, we can imagine.

Such a theoretical person might advise taking interlinking precautions that will not really apply to someone who else is doing quite "vanilla" marketing with just a handful of domains. And their advice was never really intended for some of the people who read it - but still they thought they caught a pass and then tried to run with the ball.

I have never worried about C-class issues, and I have never noticed any problems with interlinking domains that were only loosely related, but occasionally touched in topical areas where some crosslinks made sense for the visitor.


 4:37 pm on Sep 12, 2006 (gmt 0)

Thank you tedster

Tropical Island

 5:31 pm on Sep 12, 2006 (gmt 0)

I have 3 sites that are all related to the same general area but deal with 3 different levels. State, city, actual business.

I have links from one to the other because it is a natural thing to do.

All my sites rank well and have for years.

This is only 3 sites.

There may be penalties for more than that?


 6:21 pm on Sep 12, 2006 (gmt 0)

Please be cautious. Interlinking in general isn't bad, but adding many pages that interlink at one time will definetly cause a flag in Google and could get a site banned. If you do start to interlink sites make sure you do it REAL slow. Even though its completely relevant to interlink sites within the same category and makes sense from a user perspective, this is one area Google will flag you for trying to help your ranking by the additions of large amounts of BL's to one site/multiple sites IF you do it too fast. Take it SLOW :)

[edited by: Aforum at 6:22 pm (utc) on Sep. 12, 2006]

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved