| 2:12 pm on Sep 30, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Is this the big end of summer change we were all waiting for?
| 2:54 pm on Sep 30, 2006 (gmt 0)|
| 3:01 pm on Sep 30, 2006 (gmt 0)|
>> Is this the big end of summer change we were all waiting for?
If it is then I'm still up the air trying to figure out where the improvement is. Sorry GG but this time I really find low quality + I am kinda frustrated when I can't find what I am looking for.
The terrible thing when GG doesn't work, I can't use Yahoo because it's always worst and MSN is still a beta...I Will have to rely on forum postings and word of mouth quite a bit to find what I am looking for soon I'm afraid. My 2 cents.
| 3:43 pm on Sep 30, 2006 (gmt 0)|
i find google groups the best bet in these days of search filters and the end of search engines...
| 10:48 am on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
As pointed out by toothake 3 days ago:-
"....there are only 3 DC's that have not reverted yet to 126.96.36.199
and those are
This is still the case today.
Whilst im probably biased with sites ranking better in these three data centres i do think the serps are much better in them.
Anyone have any ideas which areas of the UK or anywhere else these three data centres are serving? OR are they just data centres holding data and not serving anywhere?.
| 11:37 am on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
What about 188.8.131.52
Looks like the old data to me rather than from the 184.108.40.206
[edited by: UK_Web_Guy at 11:40 am (utc) on Oct. 1, 2006]
| 1:18 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Firefox is defaulting to 66.249.93.xx here in the UK.
The results on that DC look real good. The same is true for 220.127.116.11, etc.
| 1:36 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I see little movement at the moment on
So it could be a smooth Data Refresh or a quite Data Push.
Btw, still don't know exactly what the difference technically between the two said terms :-)
However, I know exactly what "Bad Data Push" is. Thanks to Adam Lanski :-)
| 2:03 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
looks like a total mess to me, im seeing sites ranking all over the place!
| 2:27 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Bad serps or good serps. I just wish to see the data of the new infrastructure of 18.104.22.168 to propagate to the rest of the DCs.
We have been waiting patiently for around a year watching Google engineers "tinker" with the 22.214.171.124 . Don't they have better things to do :-)
| 3:23 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
does anyone know what &meta= at the end of a search on a 'tracker'
i think that his something to do with the 'new' data base that will be used
| 3:26 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
126.96.36.199 is very old data - it has a number of my pages looking like they did 1/2 a year ago (old title and cashe)
| 7:41 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
" I just wish to see"
Me too, but probably we will have to wait until the new PR update spread to all DC's then a Google directory update and then a cut off of the many Wikicancer dublicate pages that are all over the place,then maybe Google will have some more space for more interesting SERPS and an update like alegra or florida.
PS does anyone knows when the hurricane season begins?
| 7:45 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Last of the old data?
188.8.131.52 - gfe-py
184.108.40.206 - gfe-ug
I'll take a look sometime...
For weeks, gve-gv had been holding on to old data, but even that updated recently.
| 11:37 pm on Oct 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
220.127.116.11 has propagate to the rest of the DCs.That's all folks.
Good luck to all of us.
| 1:05 am on Oct 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
And thats a shame because the serps were much better before on the other data centres imo.
On one site we work on its amazing how you get a site page that ranks in position 3 before and now its 81 - does that sound like a penulty?
| 1:41 am on Oct 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
No, that's not all. I still see flux...
| 1:56 am on Oct 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
No... Not done...
I still get an old version but can't figure out how to get the IP for those results...
Anyone can tell me and I will publish the IP here...
| 7:24 am on Oct 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
open comand prompt and write ping google.com
| 7:36 am on Oct 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
behaving like pulsars(http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l2/pulsars.html)
< continued here: [webmasterworld.com...] >
[edited by: tedster at 11:15 pm (utc) on Oct. 3, 2006]
| This 200 message thread spans 7 pages: < < 200 ( 1 2 3 4 5 6  ) |