| 12:18 pm on Aug 4, 2006 (gmt 0)|
yes..its just plain text at the end of the day..google will follow the link inside the script....
| 1:04 pm on Aug 4, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Previously for many years Google did not/ could not read Java Script now it can.
Thats my take on it
| 6:52 pm on Aug 4, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for the answers guys.
So the simple answer is that Gbot can read onclick js code. The question is now, will it follow the real url inside a href or it'll follow the onclick (window.open(url)) url as well? I need it just to follow the url inside a href not the other one...
Is it possible? Is Gbot that smart to follow both urls? If it is, do you have some idea how to send spider bots (to allow them to see full real url) to certian place and people with js on, to go through the script and also open the dest. url, but as I said their click would go through js function window.open and then inside it will be placed script through which will browser go...
Get my question?
| 3:46 pm on Aug 5, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Google can, and often will, follow anything that it even suspects is an URL on a webpage. That includes anything in the text, in comments and in the JS.
That does not mean that all those URLs will get full credit as a link. They won't. Google just uses that information to try and find new pages. The href= is the part that will get all the credit, including the PR and the link text.
| 4:43 pm on Aug 5, 2006 (gmt 0)|
BigDave, you said it well -- this is exactly my experience over many sites. A link is the element that PR measures, and the element that "anchor text influence" is all about. Anything else that looks like a uri may be tested by the spiders (they are a uri-hungry bunch) but it just doesn't have the same effect on ranking that a link does.
| 12:25 am on Aug 6, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Hey guys...thanks for the answers!
I got it now... Just another question...
What about the site that contains only pictures that link to other sites....let's say I have 100 pics (10pics in 10 rows) and all of them have some alt text...also all of them link to other sites where is link back to my site.
Will google like this kind of linking? It'll follow all the links on my site, but won't it penalize such a behaviour just because it might be looking like link farm....tons of links (just imgs with alt text might be considered as some content) and nothing more... Is it ok to make such a site? Just pure hard links to those sites but just inside pics. You get me, right?
Thanks in advance,
| 12:33 am on Aug 6, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Images like pixel links?
| 12:47 am on Aug 6, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Are you doing work arounds with Flash design by chance?
| 1:35 am on Aug 6, 2006 (gmt 0)|
No, just real pics (thumbnails) with their own width and height... say 100x100 each pic that will lead to particular site, associated within that thumb.
I used to do Flash designs in the past, not anymore. I don't have time for designs. I just optimize my sites as much as I can for SEs, and Flash is not a good choice if you ask me ;)
| 12:28 pm on Aug 7, 2006 (gmt 0)|