homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.230.186
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: goodroi

Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues Forum

    
Report: Google Has Removed Over 50 pct of Submissions Under EU's "Right to be Forgotten"
engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4690562 posted 11:47 am on Jul 25, 2014 (gmt 0)

If the figures are true, that's a great deal of work.

I wonder how many of those links will end up in dispute. This exercise could become very costly, if it's not already.

I can see this going back to the regulators to work out a better way.

Google Inc. has removed tens of thousands of links—possibly more than 100,000—from its European search results from some individuals, according to a person familiar with the matter, illustrating the scale of Europe's nascent "right to be forgotten."

The Mountain View, Calif., company told European privacy regulators during a meeting in Brussels Thursday that it has removed slightly more than 50% of the links that it has so far processed under the new right, the person said.Report: Google Has Removed Over 50 pct of Submissions Under EU's "Right to be Forgotten" [online.wsj.com]

 

Samizdata

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4690562 posted 12:38 pm on Jul 25, 2014 (gmt 0)

Some have been demanding that Google end its notifications to websites that have been the subject of right to be forgotten requests, which have in some cases made it possible to identify the person making the request.

So webmasters who are quite legally publishing accurate facts on sites which are not subject to the so-called "right to be forgotten" should not be told that SERPs pointing to their content are being censored by a private company operating a quasi-judicial process against which there is no right of appeal.

Funny thing, progress.

...

piatkow

WebmasterWorld Senior Member piatkow us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4690562 posted 2:14 pm on Jul 25, 2014 (gmt 0)

If Google are just "a private company" then fine, they can drop whoever they like from the SERPS. Their only obligation is to comply with legal restrictions over sites which must not be listed.

Samizdata

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4690562 posted 3:03 pm on Jul 25, 2014 (gmt 0)

Their only obligation is to comply with legal restrictions over sites which must not be listed.

Sorry, that is just misleading.

Commercial search engines operating in the EU have an obligation to process applications under the so-called "right to be forgotten" and to make a quasi-legal decision whether to grant them or not.

If the search engine decides to grant the application then search queries on the applicant's name are censored.

The pages that mention the name are still indexed and still appear in the SERPs for other queries.

Google's current practise is to notify webmasters who are affected, though there is no right of appeal.

There are no "legal restrictions over sites which must not be listed".

...

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved